Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500

Fact check: Post Title: Artist Jonathan Harris and his painting titled “Critical Race Theory" Original Reddit link: https://old.reddit.com/r/pics/comments/1io6yo4/artist_jonathan_harris_and_his_painting_titled/

Checked on February 13, 2025

1. Summary of the results

The statement about Jonathan Harris and his painting "Critical Race Theory" is confirmed accurate. Harris created this artwork in 2021, which depicts historical Black figures (Martin Luther King Jr., Harriet Tubman, and Malcolm X) being painted over with white paint [1]. The painting gained significant attention, with Harris selling over 1,000 prints after its initial exhibition at Detroit's Irwin House Gallery in November 2021 [1] [1].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The original statement lacks crucial context about:

  • The artwork's deeper meaning: The painting symbolizes the potential erasure of Black history through educational policy changes [1]
  • The broader political context: The artwork was created during a period of intense debate about critical race theory in education, with:
    • 35 states introducing 137 bills limiting how schools can teach about race, American history, politics, and identity by early 2022 [2]
    • Conservative groups and Republican lawmakers actively seeking to restrict or ban teaching about race and racism in schools since 2020 [2]

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

While the basic statement itself contains no misinformation, its brevity omits crucial context about:

  • The political significance of the artwork: The painting was created as a direct response to legislative efforts regarding critical race theory in education [1]
  • The broader cultural impact: The controversy around CRT has become part of a larger culture war, with:
    • Conservative activists arguing that CRT is divisive and potentially anti-American [2]
    • The artwork serving as a commentary on these political and social debates [1]

Those benefiting from different interpretations include:

  • Conservative politicians and activists: Who benefit from framing CRT as a divisive issue
  • Educational institutions and civil rights advocates: Who benefit from highlighting the importance of comprehensive historical education
  • The artist himself: Who has achieved commercial success through the controversy, selling over 1,000 prints [1]
Want to dive deeper?
Jamal Roberts gave away his winnings to an elementary school.
Did a theater ceiling really collapse in the filming of the latest Final Destination?
Is Rachel Zegler suing South Park?