Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500

Fact check: Democrats didn't vote for harris because she's too progressive

Checked on April 15, 2025

1. Summary of the results

The original statement appears to be factually incorrect. Multiple sources indicate that Harris's political positioning is far more complex than simply being "too progressive." While she was ranked as one of the most liberal senators during her time in Congress [1], her actual campaign strategy was notably centrist, even attempting to court Republican voters [2]. Her record shows a mix of progressive and moderate positions, with her tenure as California Attorney General being particularly moderate [1].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

Several crucial pieces of context are missing from the original statement:

  • Harris has a complex political evolution, being described as both a "pragmatic moderate" by The New York Times and ranking as the fourth-most liberal senator from 2017-2019 [3]
  • Her legislative record shows mixed approaches:
    • Only 15% of her bills were bipartisan [1]
    • She had a high rate of bill cosponsorship in the 116th Congress [4]

  • Her campaign actually distanced itself from progressive positions and included collaboration with Republicans like Liz Cheney [5]
  • She was successfully elected as part of the Biden-Harris ticket in 2020, contradicting the premise that Democrats wouldn't vote for her [6]
  • 3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

    The statement appears to contain several biases and oversimplifications:

    • Oversimplification of her political stance: While some critics, including Trump, labeled her as "the most liberal person in the US Senate" [1], her actual record shows a more nuanced approach
    • Competing narratives benefit different groups:
      • Progressive groups benefit from portraying her as too moderate [2]
      • Conservative critics benefit from painting her as "far left" [1]
      • Moderate Democrats benefit from emphasizing her centrist positions [3]

  • One source argues strongly that she is definitively progressive, citing positions on gun control and healthcare [7], while another provides evidence that she explicitly ran a centrist campaign [5], showing how her positions can be interpreted differently depending on political perspective
  • Want to dive deeper?
    Jamal Roberts gave away his winnings to an elementary school.
    Did a theater ceiling really collapse in the filming of the latest Final Destination?
    Is Rachel Zegler suing South Park?