Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Has any US president ever attempted to pardon themselves?
Executive summary
No U.S. president in recorded history has definitively tried to pardon himself; the question is legally unresolved and has never been tested in court (Constitution Annotated) [1]. The Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) concluded in a 2014 opinion that “the President cannot pardon himself” based on the principle that one cannot be a judge in his own case, but other scholars note that the Constitution and Supreme Court precedent do not finally resolve the issue [2] [1].
1. Legal status: unresolved but counseled against self‑pardons
Congress’s Constitution Annotated says whether a president may self‑pardon is “an unresolved legal question for which there is no judicial precedent,” underscoring that courts have not settled the point [1]. By contrast, the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel directly concluded that a president cannot pardon himself “under the fundamental rule that no one may be a judge in his own case” [2] — a formal executive‑branch legal view that many commentators treat as authoritative but not binding on courts [2] [1].
2. Historical practice: no tested instance of a self‑pardon
Available sources report no successful or judicially tested self‑pardon by any president. Scholarship and law‑school transcripts note that scholars know of no federal‑level attempt by a president to pardon himself that has been adjudicated, which is why the issue remains hypothetical rather than doctrinally settled [3] [1]. Gerald Ford’s pardon of Richard Nixon after Nixon’s resignation is often cited as a precedent for broad clemency, but it was issued by a successor, not a self‑pardon [4].
3. Arguments on both sides: textual versus structural reasoning
Proponents of a possible self‑pardon emphasize the broad, textual grant of clemency in Article II — “the Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States” — and the absence of explicit constitutional language forbidding a self‑pardon [1] [4]. Opponents cite structural and normative principles — notably OLC’s reliance on the rule that no one should judge their own case — and argue a self‑pardon would conflict with foundational separation‑of‑powers norms [2] [4].
4. Practical limits: impeachment and state prosecutions
Even if a president could issue a self‑pardon for federal crimes, the Constitution expressly excludes “Cases of Impeachment” from the pardon power, meaning impeachment and conviction remain potential checks [1]. Additionally, presidential pardons apply only to federal offenses; state criminal charges would not be affected by a federal self‑pardon, a point repeatedly noted in recent reporting about high‑profile figures facing state as well as federal exposure [4] [5].
5. Why it matters now: contemporary political context
Recent high‑profile presidential pardons and mass clemency actions have revived public interest in self‑pardon doctrine; commentary after the 2024–2025 cycle stresses the theoretical risk and political consequences of any attempt at self‑pardon [6] [7]. Reporting and legal analysis have treated a self‑pardon as a constitutional test: “the only way to answer” the question, some sources say, would be for a president to attempt it and for courts to confront the ensuing litigation [4].
6. What would likely happen if a president tried it
Sources suggest two likely developments: immediate legal challenges and political fallout. The Constitution Annotated and Brennan Center reporting foresee litigation that could reach the Supreme Court because the question has no controlling precedent [1] [4]. The OLC view indicates the executive branch would not internally endorse a self‑pardon, but that would not prevent a president from issuing one and forcing the judiciary to resolve whether it is valid [2] [4].
7. Alternative viewpoints and political stakes
Legal scholars disagree: some argue a self‑pardon is constitutionally permissible based on textual silence, while others say constitutional structure and long‑standing norms forbid it [1] [4]. Political critics warn such a move would be seen as an abuse of power and could prompt congressional or public responses regardless of judicial outcome [7]. Available sources do not mention any instance where a president actually issued a self‑pardon that was then litigated to final judgment [1] [2].
Conclusion: The short factual answer is that no president has successfully pardoned himself and the question remains legally unresolved; authoritative executive‑branch guidance (OLC) says a self‑pardon would be invalid, while scholarly debate and the Constitution’s silence mean a definitive legal answer would require a real‑world test and judicial ruling [2] [1] [4].