Has Donald Trump done anything good in his second term?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Donald Trump’s second term so far is defined by a barrage of executive actions—218 executive orders as of early December 2025—and a small number of high-profile legislative wins such as the One Big Beautiful Bill and the Laken Riley Act; supporters point to job growth and corporate investment claims, while critics highlight rollbacks on climate policy and large fiscal costs [1] [2] [3] [4]. Major independent outlets and trackers show a presidency heavy on executive orders and administrative reshaping rather than broad bipartisan legislation [1] [5].
1. “A White-Hot Executive Pen” — What’s been delivered quickly
Trump’s administration has relied on executive actions as the primary tool of governance in 2025: federal records and trackers report 218 executive orders, 55 memoranda and over 100 proclamations signed in his second term through early December 2025 [1] [6]. Contemporary accounts from the first 100 days characterized the period as an “explosion of executive action,” with many orders explicitly rescinding prior Biden-era policies [5] [2].
2. “Legislative Hits, But Few Sweeping Laws” — What Congress actually passed
Supporters point to passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill (OBBBA) — described as a large tax cut and policy package that makes permanent previous tax cuts, adds Medicaid work requirements, and increases border spending — and the Laken Riley Act as some of the concrete legislative results of the early term [2] [4]. Newsweek’s analysis framed the first six months as unusually productive in legislative terms for a modern president, crediting partisan congressional alignment for moving big bills [7]. Independent analyses, however, note that aside from OBBBA and a few focused laws, much of the administration’s agenda has advanced administratively rather than through broad, bipartisan statute [5].
3. “Economy and Jobs: Competing Claims” — What the administration asserts
White House releases and allied outlets highlight strong job creation numbers (a claimed net of 671,000 jobs added since January 2025), surging tariff revenues, and large private-sector investment pledges — figures the administration uses to argue its economic record is a success [3]. These claims originate in partisan White House briefs and the president’s communications; independent trackers cited in the dataset note inherited macroeconomic conditions and caution that many economic effects are filtered through policy changes like tariffs and tax cuts [4] [3]. Available sources do not provide a single neutral metric reconciling all the administration’s claims with independent macroeconomic assessments.
4. “Policy Rollbacks and Controversies” — Where critics focus
Within hours of inauguration the president withdrew the U.S. from the Paris Agreement and issued “Unleashing American Energy,” pausing certain climate-related funding and reversing federal climate references — moves critics say undermine climate policy and the energy transition [2]. The administration has revived prior-era immigration measures and expanded enforcement, including national emergency declarations and increased troop deployments to the southern border, prompting legal challenges and state pushback [4] [8] [9].
5. “Court, Agency and Staffing Changes” — Structural shifts
The administration’s actions extend beyond policy directives to personnel and institutional change: reports describe large-scale federal staffing reductions, reclassification of roles, and efforts to reshape regulatory and judicial landscapes—echoing earlier claims about flipping appellate circuits in prior years and ongoing lawsuits over agency moves [10] [11]. These structural changes are presented by allies as efficiency measures and by opponents as politicization of the civil service; sources show legal challenges and injunctions are already affecting implementation [10] [9].
6. “Messaging vs. Independent Coverage” — How to weigh sources
Official White House materials portray sweeping “historic successes,” citing dollar figures, jobs totals, and program eliminations; independent outlets such as AP, Ballotpedia and Newsweek document the administrative volume and contextualize claims—Newsweek’s AI-assisted study framed the term as productive in partisan legislative terms, while Ballotpedia and the Federal Register provide granular counts of executive actions [3] [7] [1] [6]. Readers should note partisan press releases assert benefits that require verification against neutral statistics or long-term outcomes [3] [5].
7. “Bottom line: Has he ‘done anything good’?” — A balanced reading
If “good” is measured by getting policy priorities enacted and by immediate executive effects, the administration has been highly effective: many campaign promises were implemented rapidly via executive orders and a few major legislative items reached law [1] [2] [4]. If “good” is judged by bipartisan durability, long-term policy outcomes, or independent validation of economic claims, the record is mixed and contested: major rollbacks on climate and aggressive administrative restructuring have provoked legal battles and broad debate [2] [9] [5]. Available sources do not settle whether claimed economic gains will persist or outweigh fiscal and institutional costs in the long run.
Limitations: this summary uses only the provided documents and cites them verbatim; it does not include additional independent economic or polling data beyond those sources and notes where reporting is partisan or contested [3] [5].