Have the house started impeachment of trump now
Executive summary
The U.S. House of Representatives has not, as of the latest reporting, completed a formal impeachment of President Donald J. Trump — there has been no House vote sending articles of impeachment to the Senate — but multiple members have introduced resolutions and Democrats are publicly debating and threatening to commence proceedings, so the process has been activated in a preliminary, document-and-discussion sense rather than culminating in an impeachment vote [1] [2] [3].
1. What “started” looks like: bills, resolutions and press threats
Several distinct impeachment resolutions have been filed in the current Congress, including H.Res.353, H.Res.537 and H.Res.939, each of which explicitly states that the House should impeach President Trump and lays out alleged articles of impeachment in text available on Congress.gov [2] [4] [3]. Filing a resolution is a formal congressional act that memorializes accusations and proposes articles, but under House rules it does not by itself equal an approved impeachment; an approved impeachment requires a House majority vote to adopt articles and transmit them to the Senate [2] [4].
2. Where the media and House leaders place the debate
Mainstream reporting and Congressional communications make a clear distinction between proposals and an active impeachment vote: news outlets summarizing the situation emphasize that while members have introduced articles and activists are pushing for action, “Trump is not currently being impeached” in the sense of an adopted House impeachment [1]. House Democratic leaders have publicly threatened to commence impeachment proceedings against other officials (for example DHS Secretary Kristi Noem) and have signaled readiness to use impeachment tools if political conditions or administration behavior warrant it, reflecting strategic and partisan considerations informing whether to move from resolutions to votes [5] [6].
3. The political calculus: timing, midterms and intra-party debate
Democrats are internally divided about whether to pursue a third impeachment now or wait until after the 2026 midterms; some progressives push for immediate action while institutional leaders worry that an impeachment push could energize the president’s base and affect House control calculations [7]. Commentators and local reporters also note that impeachment requires a majority in the House — something that is dependent on the chamber’s partisan math and public opinion — and that historical context (two previous impeachments in Trump’s first term) colors the strategic discussion [8] [9].
4. What the resolutions allege and the evidentiary claims on offer
The text of the filed resolutions is broad in scope: some accuse Trump of abusing presidential power through unauthorized military actions or incitement and threats against institutions and officials, and they lay out multiple articles of impeachment that proponents argue meet the constitutional standard for “high crimes and misdemeanors” [4] [3]. Outside activist groups and advocacy sites have advanced much more detailed narratives of alleged incidents as part of the push to impeach, but those accounts reside outside congressional text or mainstream confirmation and should be treated as advocacy material unless corroborated by independent reporting [10].
5. Bottom line: active steps taken, but no House impeachment vote yet
Factually, the House has not yet adopted articles of impeachment against President Trump in this session — what exists now are introduced resolutions and public threats or intentions from some House Democrats to commence proceedings if conditions warrant, which means the impeachment mechanism is being exercised in preparatory form but has not reached the decisive majority vote stage that would constitute an actual impeachment by the House [2] [1] [6]. Sources indicate ongoing debate and that the decision to move forward remains politically fraught and contingent on strategic calculations about timing and consequences [7].