Have House Republicans resumed voting in Congress in 2025?

1. What the original claim actually asserts and why it matters

The original question asks simply whether House Republicans have resumed voting in Congress in 2025, a factual claim about whether Republican members participated in formal roll-call or floor votes during the year. Establishing that matters because votes determine whether legislative priorities that House Republicans advanced become law, and because resumption of voting signals the functional status of the chamber after transitions, rule changes, or interruptions such as adjournments or government shutdowns. The provided material includes contemporaneous reporting of a rules vote on January 3 and later coverage of adjournments, district work periods, and a protracted shutdown context that limited continuous floor action ^{[1] [2] [3] [4] [5]}.

2. Early January: clear resumption — the House adopted a rules package

The clearest affirmative evidence that House Republicans resumed formal voting appears on January 3, 2025, when the House adopted a new rules package on a recorded 215–209 vote. That rules adoption is an unambiguous floor vote and indicates the chamber was functioning and holding roll-call votes at the start of the 119th Congress. The rules package included procedural limits such as restricting suspension votes to Mondays through Wednesdays and curbs on motions to vacate the chair, and it was adopted amid intra-party operating debates that shaped how the House would conduct votes going forward ^{[1] [2]}. This procedural vote demonstrates the House was not entirely dormant and that Republican majorities were able to carry party-line measures at the outset of the session.

3. But then the calendar and adjournments produced intermittent voting, not continuous floor sessions

After the January rules adoption, the House’s calendar and leadership decisions produced periods of little or no floor voting. Reporting notes the Speaker sent lawmakers home in September after the chamber approved its own funding bill, and later descriptions emphasize a shutdown standoff that left the House out of normal legislative rhythm and caused protracted adjournments and pauses in voting activity. Coverage of the shutdown frames the House as having passed a short-term measure in September yet returning to district work and limited floor action while negotiations continued in the Senate and between parties ^{[3] [6] [4]}. These accounts portray intermittent voting, with votes happening on key items but not a sustained, continuous floor schedule.

4. The official calendar corroborates in-session moments and district work interruptions

The House calendar and press-gallery tracking corroborate a hybrid pattern: the House was in session on November 4, 2025 with the next meeting scheduled for that date at 2:00 p.m., but subsequent entries show the chamber adjourning pursuant to its rules and designating a district work period from November 3–9, 2025. That official scheduling explains why votes may be concentrated on particular days and why members might not be casting roll calls during adjournments. The calendar therefore supports the reality that voting resumed and occurred, but that the frequency of votes was driven by schedule, adjournments, and extraordinary events such as the shutdown rather than a continuous daily voting rhythm ^[5].

5. Reconciling the evidence: resumed votes amid episodic pauses and political standoffs

Taken together, the record shows an unambiguous early resumption of floor voting with the January rules vote and subsequent votes tied to funding measures and party priorities, yet also shows episodic pauses driven by district work periods, leadership decisions to adjourn, and a multi-week shutdown standoff that interrupted sustained floor activity. Reported debates over continuing resolutions, expulsions of suspension votes, and the House passing its own funding bill but awaiting Senate action illustrate how procedural votes and partisan strategy created an on-again, off-again voting pattern rather than continuous voting through 2025 ^{[1] [2] [6] [4] [5]}.

6. Bottom line: direct answer with context

Yes — House Republicans resumed voting in 2025, demonstrably casting recorded votes such as the January 3 rules-package adoption; however, their voting was not continuous across the year. The House alternated between floor votes, district work periods, adjournments, and a significant shutdown standoff that limited the steady cadence of roll-call activity. The most relevant source passages are the January 3 recorded rules vote and calendar entries showing adjourning and district work, supplemented by reporting on the September funding maneuvers and the subsequent shutdown negotiations that curtailed regular floor voting ^{[1] [2] [3] [6] [4] [5]}.