Did the Heritage Foundation disclose all donors to Project 2025 and when?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
The Heritage Foundation launched Project 2025 publicly in April 2023 and hosted a Project 2025 website and materials through at least March 2025 (Heritage’s site and Mandate for Leadership/Conservative Promise) [1]. Reporting since 2024–2025 shows outside investigators and outlets tracing major donor networks and payments to organizations that advised Project 2025, but available sources do not show Heritage publishing a comprehensive, line‑by‑line public donor list specifically tied to Project 2025 donors at a single disclosed date [2] [3] [4].
1. What Heritage said publicly and when: Project 2025’s roll‑out
Heritage publicly unveiled Project 2025’s core policy work — the Mandate/Conservative Promise — in April 2023 and maintained a Project 2025 website describing the initiative and listing participating organizations through at least March 2025 [1] [5]. Heritage framed the effort as a coalition and a “conservative LinkedIn” for staffing and policy playbooks, and it published the long Mandate document and related training materials during that period [5] [1].
2. What independent reporting found about funders and timing
Investigations by DeSmog and others assembled financial trails showing that donor networks tied to a handful of wealthy families and foundations have channeled substantial sums to Project 2025 advisory groups and allied nonprofits since 2020 — a figure DeSmog estimated at more than $120 million across six donor networks — indicating major private funding feeding organizations linked to Project 2025 even before Heritage’s public launch [2]. Snopes’ review likewise found that several corporate family foundations had historically given to Heritage, while noting only the Adolph Coors Foundation still publicly disclosed support as of 2024 [3].
3. No single Heritage “Project 2025 donor roll” found in reporting
Available sources do not cite a Heritage‑published, exhaustive donor roster for Project 2025 with a specific disclosure date. Journalistic and watchdog pieces instead trace money through giving to advisory organizations or to Heritage generally, and they identify donor networks and foundations that funded advisory partners rather than a Heritage spreadsheet of Project 2025 donors [2] [3] [4]. Wikipedia and other summaries document shifting partner lists on Heritage’s Project 2025 site, but do not present a Heritage disclosure of all donors [4] [1].
4. Why imperfect disclosure matters: funding versus advisory networks
Investigators distinguish between donors who give to Heritage itself and donors who fund the many nonprofits on Project 2025’s advisory list. DeSmog’s analysis argues that concentrated donor networks have financially supported many advisory organizations tied to the project, which is materially different from Heritage publishing “we received X from Y for Project 2025” [2]. Snopes shows some major corporate family foundations have given to Heritage or to advisory groups in past years, but public acknowledgment of donations varies by foundation and year [3].
5. Conflicting narratives and the institutional stakes
Heritage publicly depicted Project 2025 as a mainstream conservative blueprint and personnel pipeline [5]. Opponents and watchdogs framed the project as beholden to wealthy donor networks and linked to far‑right influences — claims supported by reporting on donor flows to advisory groups and on the makeup of contributors and applicants [2] [6]. Both lines of reporting are present in current sources: Heritage’s own descriptions [5] and independent investigations into funding and collaborator lists [2] [6].
6. What the record does and does not prove
Available reporting proves: Heritage ran Project 2025 publicly beginning April 2023 and that substantial giving to advisory groups tied to the project came from concentrated donor networks, tracked back several years [1] [2]. Available sources do not show Heritage issuing a single, complete disclosure of “all donors to Project 2025” with a date — nor do the sources claim to have found such a Heritage document [2] [3]. Wikipedia and lists of contributors document shifting advisory rosters but do not substitute for a formal donor disclosure [4].
7. Takeaway and unanswered questions
If your question is whether Heritage publicly and comprehensively disclosed every donor behind Project 2025 at a single time: current reporting indicates no such comprehensive Heritage disclosure is documented in the available sources [2] [3]. Remaining open questions for researchers: did Heritage provide donor details piecemeal in IRS filings, foundation reports, or donor‑specific acknowledgments that are not covered in these sources, and which funding directly financed Project 2025 programming as opposed to general Heritage operations — available sources do not mention those granular filings or provide a full ledger [3] [2].
Sources cited: Project 2025 site and Heritage pages on Project 2025 [1] [5]; DeSmog donor analysis [2]; Snopes donor review [3]; contributor and website history from Wikipedia [4]; Guardian reporting on internal/project materials and applicants [6].