Which president had the highest Gallup approval average and what policies drove it?
Executive summary
Gallup’s historical tracking shows the single highest Gallup job-approval reading for any president was 90% for George W. Bush shortly after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks (Gallup’s peak), and Gallup’s historical pages and related summaries cite that spike as the record high in their series [1] [2]. Multiple summaries and data aggregators confirm Gallup is the consistent source for long-run presidential approval comparisons [3] [2].
1. Peak approval: patriotism and crisis produced a 90% high for George W. Bush
Gallup’s long-running series records George W. Bush’s immediate post‑9/11 approval spike — a 90% approval rating — which is the single highest point Gallup has tracked for any president [1]. Gallup’s Presidential Job Approval Center explains its methodology and that its series is the go‑to historical measure used to compare presidents across the modern polling era [2] [3].
2. What drove that peak: national security, the “rally ’round the flag” effect
Contemporaneous analysts and retrospective polling summaries attribute Bush’s 90% reading to the national shock of the Sept. 11 attacks and a strong “rally ’round the flag” response to perceived leadership on national security — the classic crisis-driven surge in presidential approval [1]. The Gallup narrative and historical data make clear the spike was tied to a single extraordinary event rather than long-term consensus about policy [2].
3. How Gallup measures and why the record matters for comparisons
Gallup is the consistent longitudinal source for these comparisons because it has asked the same approval question across administrations; analysts and data repositories point to Gallup’s continuity as the reason its highs and lows are treated as the authoritative benchmark [3] [2]. That continuity matters: single-day or short-run spikes (like Bush’s 90%) are captured in Gallup’s series and are comparable across presidencies because of the stable question wording and methodology [2].
4. Limitations: peaks are snapshots, not endorsements of broad policy success
A 90% peak is a momentary snapshot, not a measure of long-term approval averages or policy endurance. Gallup’s methodology and presentation emphasize these are periodic or daily polls that reflect public mood; the 90% reading followed a national trauma, a known driver of temporary surges [2] [1]. Available sources do not claim that the 90% reflected sustained, multi‑year mandate or unanimous support for any particular domestic policy beyond national security posture [1].
5. Alternative readings: averages versus single-day highs
Other officials and media often compare both peaks and longer-run averages. The provided sources show Gallup’s single highest reading is Bush’s 90% [1], while Gallup’s broader pages and other aggregators (e.g., The American Presidency Project) emphasize multi‑poll averages for each term to show how leaders fared over time [3]. For a full picture of presidential popularity, historians and poll analysts look at average approval across a presidency rather than a crisis-driven high point [3].
6. Why context and source choice matter
Different pollsters and aggregators use different sampling rules and windows; Ballotpedia and other indexes remind readers that methodological variation can shift short-term numbers [4]. The sources provided repeatedly elevate Gallup as the consistent historical standard [3] [2], and the claim that Bush hit 90% comes directly from that Gallup-centered record [1].
7. What the sources do not cover
Available sources do not provide a breakdown, within these excerpts, tying specific domestic policy actions to the 90% approval spike beyond the broad national‑security and rally‑around‑the‑flag context [1] [2]. Detailed polling that separates approval drivers (e.g., specific policy questions) for that precise moment are not included in the provided set [1] [2].
Final takeaway: Gallup’s series identifies George W. Bush’s post‑9/11 90% approval as the highest single Gallup reading on record; that peak was driven by the national‑security crisis and the rally‑round‑the‑flag effect rather than long‑term policy consensus [1] [2].