What is the historical origin of antifa movements in the US and Europe?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Anti-fascist movements trace their lineage to interwar and World War II resistance in Europe—especially Italian and German anti-fascist groups of the 1920s–1930s and the 1932 Antifaschistische Aktion in Germany (roots cited by Britannica, CSIS, and Wikipedia) [1] [2] [3]. Modern European antifa revivals emerged in the 1960s–1980s (West Germany’s extra-parliamentary left in the 1960s, and new groups from the late 1980s), and U.S. antifa networks drew inspiration from those currents and from 1980s anti-racist organizing such as Anti-Racist Action [4] [3] [5].
1. Early resistance: 1920s–1940s — Streetfighters, partisans and political symbols
Anti-fascism began as organised resistance to rising fascist movements in Italy and Germany after World War I. Histories point to Italian groups like the Arditi del Popolo and to organised Communist and socialist anti-fascist initiatives that fought fascist squads in the streets and later inspired partisan resistance during World War II [2] [6]. The German Antifaschistische Aktion gave the movement a name, a two-flag emblem and a model of militant street organisation that later activists would reference [7] [3].
2. Postwar memory and Cold War politics — Competing legacies
After World War II, anti-fascist memory split into different political uses: in Eastern Bloc states anti-fascist rhetoric became state orthodoxy used to legitimize regimes, while in West Germany the term was revived by student radicals and the Außerparlamentarische Opposition in the 1960s as a critique of what they described as lingering authoritarianism [4] [8]. Scholars and institutions note that “anti-fascism” has long been both a genuine resistance tradition and a label various actors have employed for political ends [4] [8].
3. Revival and diversification: 1960s–1980s in Europe, 1980s–1990s in the U.S.
Modern antifa movements in Europe re-emerged in the 1960s and grew through the 1970s–1980s, often tied to autonomous, anarchist and radical-left subcultures that opposed neo-Nazi groups, skinheads and state policies [3] [5]. In the United States, scholars and organizational histories trace contemporary antifa influence to anti-racist organizing of the 1980s—groups like Anti-Racist Action (ARA) and later local networks that adopted direct-action tactics and the antifa moniker [5] [9].
4. Tactics and ideology: Direct action, decentralization, and diverse roots
Modern antifa is not a single organisation but a decentralized set of networks and affinity groups that blend anarchist, communist and autonomous traditions; tactics range from nonviolent disruption and “deplatforming” to confrontational street actions and property damage according to multiple observers [1] [2] [5]. Analysts emphasise the movement’s ideological heterogeneity and leaderless structure, which complicates claims about coordination or a single chain of command [10] [5].
5. Symbolic lineage versus organizational continuity
Many contemporary antifa activists explicitly claim inspiration from interwar and wartime anti-fascists—using names, symbols and the language of “never again”—but historians and policy analysts stress that historical lineage is symbolic rather than continuous institutional descent; the 1930s Antifaschistische Aktion is an aesthetic and rhetorical ancestor rather than an unbroken organisation [7] [8].
6. Political contention and how sources frame origins
Official and political actors frame antifa differently: security analysts and some governments highlight violent incidents and militant cells when arguing threat narratives, while research institutions, historians and civil-society groups emphasize decentralized ideology and roots in earlier anti-fascist traditions; both frames appear across sources [11] [10] [1]. Note: recent U.S. and international designations and political claims (executive orders, State Department listings) reflect contemporary security debates not historical consensus [12] [13].
7. What the sources don’t settle and remaining disagreements
Available sources agree on the deep European roots and on the U.S. emergence from 1980s anti-racist networks, but they diverge on how to characterise present-day antifa’s cohesion and threat level: some security briefings treat it as a network of violent actors, others as an ideology with occasional violent adherents [5] [10] [11]. Sources do not mention a single founding organisation that carried through from the 1930s into today; continuity is interpretive and symbolic rather than institutional [7] [8].
8. Bottom line for readers
Antifa’s historical origin is rooted in genuine interwar and wartime anti-fascist struggle—notably Italian and German movements—and was reborn in new forms across the late 20th century in Europe and the U.S. as both a political identity and a set of tactics; contemporary debates about whether antifa is a coherent organisation, a threat, or a decentralized ideology reflect political disagreements in the sources and are not resolved by a single authoritative account [1] [5] [10].