What was the exact roll call vote date for the House CR that mentioned SNAP in 2025?

1. Conflicting official-record and Clerk-citation claim — March 11, 2025 raises a direct record that must be tested

One of the analyses asserts an Office of the Clerk roll‑call entry naming Roll Call 70 on H.R. 1968, the Full‑Year Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act, with a recorded date of March 11, 2025 ^[1]. That citation, if accurate, would be an official House roll‑call record because the Clerk maintains the canonical roll‑call database. If the Clerk entry indeed lists March 11, 2025, as the roll call related to the CR that mentions SNAP, that is the definitive date for that particular vote. The analysis explicitly ties the CR text to SNAP within that March entry, making this a strong claim of an official archival source ^[1]. However, the presence of alternative dates in other materials means the March claim needs corroboration against the Clerk’s web record or the Congressional Record for final confirmation.

2. Alternative claim — September 19, 2025 appears in a fact‑check summary as a House passage date

A separate analysis interprets reporting to conclude the House passed a continuing resolution that included SNAP funding by a roll‑call vote of 217–212 on September 19, 2025 ^[2]. That claim differs materially from the March date and asserts both a vote tally and a specific day in late summer. If September 19 is accurate for a House passage of a CR mentioning SNAP, it would reflect a distinct legislative action or a different version of a CR than the March or November claims. The fact‑check summary style of the source suggests synthesis from media reporting; that increases the importance of tracing back to the Clerk’s roll‑call archive and House calendars to determine whether a September roll‑call on a CR occurred and whether it specifically referenced SNAP in its text or amendments.

3. Shutdown context pushes votes into November 2025 — reporters cite November 12–13 as House roll‑call timing

Multiple news analyses tie CR votes that addressed SNAP to the end‑of‑year shutdown and pin House roll‑call activity to November 12 and November 13, 2025 ^{[3] [4] [5]}. One narrative indicates a procedural vote set for the evening of November 12, with initial and final votes timed that day ^[3], while others note members were instructed votes could begin by 4 p.m. ET on November 13 ^[4]. These accounts place the CR in the highly time‑sensitive shutdown resolution context rather than in early spring or September, and they derive from contemporaneous news reporting about an active shutdown negotiation. Newsroom timelines are useful for context but are less authoritative than the Clerk’s roll‑call database for the exact roll‑call date.

4. Why these discrepancies matter — multiple CRs, amendments, or separate measures can generate different roll‑call dates

The presence of three distinct dates across sources can reflect several factual realities that are not mutually exclusive: Congress can consider multiple CRs or amendments at separate times; a full‑year appropriations measure might be introduced or voted on at different stages (procedural votes, final passage, re‑votes); and reporters may reference the date votes occurred on the floor in the context of a shutdown versus a formal recorded roll call archived by the Clerk. Disentangling which “CR that mentioned SNAP” the user means requires specifying whether they want the formal Clerk roll call number and date for H.R. 1968, the House passage date for a stopgap CR tied to the shutdown, or a parliamentary procedural vote tied to a later Senate action ^{[1] [3] [5]}.

5. Assessing source reliability and apparent agendas in the provided materials

The analyses include an explicit Office of the Clerk citation ^[1], which is the primary authority for roll‑call dates; fact‑check and news pieces ^{[2] [3] [4]} provide context but may conflate procedural and final votes or report planned vote times. Official Clerk records carry the greatest evidentiary weight for “exact roll call vote date,” while news accounts are valuable for situational chronology during a shutdown. Some summaries emphasize political framing around SNAP delays and the shutdown, which can reflect agendas to highlight policy impacts or partisan responsibility; that framing can cause reporters to emphasize the timing of floor action without documenting the exact roll‑call ID the Clerk would archive.

6. Bottom line and recommended authoritative next step

Given the conflicting dates—March 11, 2025; September 19, 2025; and November 12–13, 2025—the most authoritative resolution is to consult the Clerk of the House roll‑call database entry for the CR in question (e.g., Roll Call 70 / H.R. 1968 referenced in the materials) and the Congressional Record for the relevant day. If the user needs a single authoritative date now, the Clerk citation (March 11, 2025) is the strongest claim among the supplied analyses, but it must be verified against live Clerk records to confirm that this entry is the CR that “mentioned SNAP.” ^{[1] [2] [3]}