Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: Has the House approved a separate FY2025 appropriations bill specifically for SNAP benefits and nutrition programs?
Executive Summary
No — the House has not approved a separate FY2025 appropriations bill dedicated solely to SNAP benefits and nutrition programs. Instead, House members have introduced and sponsored emergency or stopgap proposals such as the Keep SNAP Funded Act (HR 5822) and companion measures intended to keep benefits flowing during a lapse in regular appropriations, but those actions fall short of passage of a standalone FY2025 appropriations bill for SNAP; the available reporting shows introductions and committee activity but no House approval of a separate FY2025 SNAP appropriations measure [1] [2] [3].
1. Bold claim: “Has the House approved a separate FY2025 SNAP bill?” — unpacking the assertion and the record
The core claim asks whether the House formally approved a distinct Fiscal Year 2025 appropriations bill solely for SNAP and nutrition programs. Contemporary reporting and legislative summaries document introductions and co-sponsorships aimed at maintaining SNAP payments during funding gaps, notably the Keep SNAP Funded Act introduced in the House as HR 5822, but none of the supplied sources indicate that the House enacted or approved a standalone FY2025 appropriations bill specific to SNAP. The articles consistently describe emergency provisions or proposals to appropriate unallocated funds rather than passage of a separate, finalized appropriations measure for FY2025 SNAP [3] [2] [1].
2. What the House has done: emergency bills and sponsorships, not final appropriations
House activity has centered on stopgap legislation intended to ensure uninterrupted benefits if a government shutdown occurs. Representatives, including co-sponsors like Rep. Chris Smith and Rep. Mariannette Miller‑Meeks, have backed or introduced the Keep SNAP Funded Act to appropriate existing, unallocated federal funds for SNAP during funding lapses and to create mechanisms to keep benefits flowing. These legislative moves are reactive and targeted to continuity of benefits rather than constituting a full-year appropriation bill for FY2025 specifically dedicated to SNAP; the texts and reporting emphasize temporary or contingent funding authority, not the passage of a distinct appropriations bill for FY2025 [2] [3].
3. Senate activity and competing proposals: multiple paths, same gap
The Senate has also engaged with competing bills and debate over how to ensure SNAP continuity—efforts documented as the Keep SNAP Funded Act and other proposals to appropriate funds during lapses. Reporting highlights Senate proposals meant to authorize continued benefit payments during a shutdown, but the coverage repeatedly notes division among senators and competing approaches rather than final enactment of a separate SNAP appropriations bill for FY2025. Congressional maneuvering reflects political disagreement on whether to use standalone emergency legislation, amendments to larger continuing resolutions, or leave SNAP within omnibus appropriations—none of which in the available reporting equates to House approval of a distinct FY2025 SNAP appropriation [1] [4].
4. Appropriations committee work and the FY2026 note: context but not confirmation
The House Appropriations Committee has moved forward on appropriations work, including approving the Fiscal Year 2026 Agriculture, Rural Development, FDA, and Related Agencies bill; however, that committee action concerns FY2026 and broader funding bills and does not constitute approval of a standalone FY2025 SNAP appropriations bill. Advocacy groups and coalitions, such as the Food Research & Action Center and a broad set of organizations, have publicly urged full funding for nutrition programs, but their statements focus on policy priorities and the FY2026 horizon rather than confirming separate FY2025 SNAP appropriations passage in the House [5] [6].
5. Bottom line, implications, and what to watch next
The bottom line is clear: reporting through late October 2025 documents introductions, co-sponsorships, and committee movement on companion and emergency SNAP funding bills but no evidence that the House has approved a separate FY2025 appropriations bill solely for SNAP and nutrition programs. The practical implication is that SNAP beneficiaries remain subject to the broader appropriations calendar and any short‑term stopgap measures that Congress enacts; stakeholders should watch for House floor votes on HR 5822 or inclusion of SNAP language in continuing resolutions or omnibus packages, and monitor statements from appropriations leaders and advocacy coalitions for immediate changes [3] [1] [6].