How did Pam Bondi and Trump meet? Since when do they know each other?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Pam Bondi and Donald Trump have been publicly linked as acquaintances and political allies since at least the early 2010s, with high-profile interactions documented during Bondi’s tenure as Florida attorney general and their widely reported meeting at Trump Tower during the 2016 transition period [1] [2] [3]. Reporting shows a long-standing political relationship punctuated by mutual praise, a controversial Trump Foundation donation tied to Bondi’s office, and repeated public statements by Trump that he has “known Pam for many years,” but none of the provided sources pinpoints a single first encounter [3] [1].
1. How the relationship surfaces in public records: Florida AG, Trump University scrutiny, and a Trump Foundation check
Pam Bondi’s name started appearing in national reporting tied to Donald Trump while she served as Florida attorney general, a role in which her office considered — then declined to pursue — an investigation related to Trump University, and shortly thereafter a $25,000 donation from the Trump Foundation to a pro-Bondi group drew scrutiny and ethics complaints [1] [3]. Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington documented that Bondi personally solicited the contribution and linked the donation to the timing of the Trump University matter, producing public complaints and helping cement the perception of an entanglement between the two [1].
2. The 2016 Trump Tower meeting and Trump’s public characterization of the tie
Bondi met with President-elect Trump at Trump Tower in late 2016, an encounter recorded on C-SPAN and widely cited when she was discussed as a potential member of his administration, and Trump himself has repeatedly described knowing Bondi “for years” when defending or praising her [2] [3]. That meeting is often presented in news coverage as a visible milestone in a relationship that commentators and allies framed as longstanding and friendly, and it preceded her later roles in Trump’s orbit, including participation in his legal team and eventual nomination for cabinet office [2] [4].
3. From state attorney general to Trump ally: public praise, legal roles, and reciprocal endorsements
Over the subsequent years Bondi became a regular Trump ally: she spoke for him at the 2016 Republican convention, served on his impeachment defense team in 2020, and by late 2024 was named by Trump as his pick for U.S. attorney general — moves media described as the product of a “longstanding friendship” and political alignment [1] [4] [3]. Trump’s public endorsements of Bondi and her vocal praise of him reinforced the image of a durable political partnership that transcended mere acquaintance [3] [4].
4. Controversies and competing narratives about how “long” and why
Critics and watchdog groups flagged the Trump Foundation donation and Bondi’s handling of the Trump University-related matter as evidence that their relationship had transactional elements and raised ethics questions, a narrative advanced by CREW and other watchdog reporting [1]. Supporters point to repeated meetings, mutual public praise, and Bolstered roles within Trump-aligned institutions as proof of a longstanding alliance; Trump’s own words that he had “known Pam for many years” have been used to summarize that history even as precise origins remain disputed [3] [4].
5. What the reporting does not settle: no single documented “first meeting” in available sources
None of the provided sources specify the exact date, location, or circumstance of the very first meeting between Bondi and Trump; the record instead shows multiple touchpoints across the 2010s — a contested donation in the early 2010s, high-visibility interactions by 2016, and continuing collaboration afterward — but does not establish a definitive initial encounter [1] [2] [3]. When asked about the origins in public forums, Trump has relied on shorthand claims of long acquaintance rather than providing a precise timeline, leaving the literal “when did they first meet?” question open in the available reporting [3].