Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
How did key swing Senators (e.g., Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski) vote on the 2023 continuing resolution?
Executive Summary
The three supplied analyses together show no direct, definitive record in these sources of how Senators Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski voted on the 2023 continuing resolution; instead the material addresses related actions and statements that suggest positions but stop short of recording the CR roll-call [1] [2] [3]. The pieces collectively indicate Collins publicly urged avoiding a shutdown and Murkowski supported moving other legislative items and had potential programmatic impacts from a CR, but the vote tallies or explicit yea/nay markers for the 2023 CR are absent in the provided material [1] [2] [3].
1. What the documents actually claim — straight to the point
The three analyses make distinct claims about content gaps: one notes Collins and Murkowski voting on an Equal Rights Amendment procedural motion, not on a funding extension; another summarizes Murkowski’s broader political positions without CR specifics; and the third records statements and program impacts tied to a proposed CR but does not record their votes [1] [2] [3]. Taken together, the materials confirm that the supplied sources do not include a roll-call on the 2023 continuing resolution, despite touching on related appropriations themes and Senatorial priorities. That absence is material: a reader seeking a concrete yea/nay on the CR will not find it in these documents, only contextual signals about each Senator’s general posture toward avoiding shutdowns or protecting certain funds [1] [3].
2. How Susan Collins is portrayed — public warnings, not a recorded vote
The supplied texts present Senator Susan Collins as publicly emphasizing the need to prevent a government shutdown and as active in appropriations discussions, but they do not present her recorded vote on the 2023 continuing resolution [3]. One analysis notes Collins released statements urging avoidance of a shutdown, suggesting a pragmatic approach to funding measures, yet it stops short of documenting how she cast a ballot on the specific CR package [3]. This leaves two interpretations supported by the documents: Collins was publicly aligned with keeping government funded, but whether she translated that into a formal yea or nay on the 2023 CR is not captured in the provided excerpts [3].
3. How Lisa Murkowski is portrayed — cross-party actions, but no CR vote on the record
The materials depict Senator Lisa Murkowski as willing to cross party lines on some high-profile measures — for example, supporting procedural movement on the Equal Rights Amendment — and as someone with district interests tied to CR outcomes, yet none of the supplied sources documents her specific vote on the 2023 continuing resolution [1] [2] [3]. One source explicitly discusses Murkowski’s sponsorship and votes on the ERA, illustrating a pattern of independent decisions, while another highlights that community development projects she backed could be affected by a CR proposal, implying stakes but not her ballot choice [1] [2] [3]. The record in these documents is therefore circumstantial rather than definitive.
4. Why the gap matters — context, not confirmation
The absence of a CR roll-call in the provided materials creates an evidentiary gap: researchers or readers cannot responsibly claim Collins or Murkowski voted for or against the 2023 continuing resolution based on these sources alone [1] [2] [3]. The documents are useful for contextual inference — Collins’ anti-shutdown posture and Murkowski’s programmatic concerns suggest likely preferences — but in legislative practice a public statement or program impact does not equal a recorded vote. This distinction matters because swing Senators’ votes hinge on procedural amendments, negotiated language, and logrolling; a simple statement of intent can be superseded by dealmaking at the last minute [3] [2].
5. What a complete answer would require and recommended next steps
To conclusively answer how Collins and Murkowski voted on the 2023 continuing resolution requires consulting the Senate roll-call records or contemporaneous reporting that lists the CR vote tallies and individual yea/nay votes; the supplied analyses do not provide that data [1] [2] [3]. For definitive verification, check the Senate’s official vote record for the specific 2023 CR measure or reputable contemporaneous outlets that published the roll call. The supplied sources remain valuable for context about motivations and potential impacts, but they should be supplemented with the formal roll-call record before asserting how either Senator voted on that specific continuing resolution [3] [2].