How many felonies has trump been convicted of
Executive summary
Donald Trump has been convicted on 34 felony counts — all for falsifying business records in the New York hush‑money case — and was sentenced to an unconditional discharge on January 10, 2025, meaning the conviction stands but he received no jail time or fines [1] [2] [3]. Across four criminal indictments filed between 2023–2025 he faced 88 total counts; as of late 2025, reporting says 34 convictions and 52 charges dismissed [1].
1. The conviction: 34 felony counts in Manhattan, explained
A Manhattan jury found Trump guilty on May 30, 2024 of 34 counts of falsifying business records in the first degree; each count corresponded to alleged false entries in business documents related to reimbursements and payments tied to a hush‑money scheme [1] [3]. News organizations and legal summaries consistently describe the verdict as the first felony conviction of any U.S. president, and the counts are specifically state‑law falsifying‑business‑records charges in New York [1] [3].
2. Sentencing outcome: convicted but unpunished
Although the jury returned guilty verdicts, Judge Juan Merchan sentenced Trump on January 10, 2025 to an unconditional discharge — a sentence that affirms a criminal conviction but imposes no jail time, probation, fines or other penalties — a rare result that leaves the legal status of “convicted felon” intact while imposing no further punishment [2] [3] [4]. PBS, Forbes and other outlets reported that the discharge means the conviction stands even though punitive consequences were not imposed [2] [4].
3. How this fits into the broader set of cases against Trump
Reporting and trackers list four major criminal matters filed 2023–2025 (two federal, two state) that together accounted for 88 criminal counts; Ballotpedia summarizes that, as of late 2025 reporting, 34 counts resulted in guilty findings while 52 charges were dismissed [1]. Frontline/PBS and other outlets frame the New York conviction as one thread in a wider web of indictments and legal battles that have unfolded since 2023 [5].
4. Why some reporting emphasizes “34 counts” while others emphasize “a conviction”
Journalists and analysts use two different metrics: the raw number of guilty counts and the singular fact of a criminal conviction. Political commentary sometimes treats the 34 counts as symbolic of broader accountability; other outlets stress legal technicalities — for instance that sentencing and appeals could affect final consequences even if the verdict was rendered [6] [2]. Sources vary in emphasis but converge on the factual details: guilty verdict on 34 counts and later unconditional discharge at sentencing [6] [2] [4].
5. Remaining legal uncertainty and appeals coverage in the sources
Available sources document judicial activity after the verdict — motions to overturn or to delay sentencing, and arguments about presidential immunity — and they note courts rejected immunity arguments in this case, allowing sentencing to proceed [1] [3] [5]. The news items cite multiple rulings denying attempts to vacate or pause the conviction, but they also show the criminal‑justice process continued through sentencing and post‑trial motions [1] [5].
6. Political context and how different outlets frame the meaning
Opinion and partisan outlets frame the conviction through political lenses: some portray the 34 counts as a lasting stain on Trump’s record and a validation of legal accountability [6] [7], while reporting outlets treat the unconditional discharge as legally significant because it leaves no punishment despite the conviction [2] [4]. Readers should note the sources include both news organizations (PBS, Reuters, Ballotpedia) and opinion/commentary (PJ Media, Cosmopolitan), which reflect differing agendas in emphasis and tone [6] [2] [1].
7. What the available sources do not settle
Available sources do not mention final outcomes of every pending appeal or whether any future prosecutions tied to other allegations will produce additional convictions beyond the 34 documented counts [1] [5]. They also do not provide exhaustive legal analysis of how the unconditional discharge may affect collateral consequences like travel, voting rights, or civil liability beyond noting the conviction stands [2] [4].
Sources cited: Ballotpedia (tracking indictments and the 34 convictions) [1]; PBS NewsHour and Frontline reporting on sentencing and the unconditional discharge [2] [5]; Wikipedia and contemporaneous reporting on conviction and sentencing [3]; Forbes, Houston Public Media, Cosmopolitan and PJ Media for framing and commentary on the 34 counts and political reaction [4] [8] [7] [6].