How many times has Trump lied?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
There is no single, authoritative count of how many times Donald Trump has lied; fact‑checking projects and news organizations document hundreds to thousands of false or misleading claims across his public life and his 2025 presidency alone (PolitiFact declared 2025 “the Year of the Lies”) [1][2]. Compilations such as the Wikipedia tally and repeated year‑end lists from PolitiFact, The Washington Post/Glenn Kessler and others show sustained patterns of repeated demonstrable falsehoods, but available sources do not offer a single, universally accepted numeric total [3][4][1].
1. Why “How many times” is a tricky question
Counting “lies” requires definitional choices that change the answer: do you count every inaccurate statement, every repeated falsehood, every misleading implication, or only deliberate falsehoods that meet journalistic or legal standards? Longrunning databases and encyclopedic efforts catalog thousands of false or misleading statements by Trump, but each project uses different criteria — for example, a Wikipedia list aggregates widely reported falsehoods while PolitiFact and Glenn Kessler select and rate individual claims — so no single, definitive number exists in the record [3][4][1].
2. What major fact‑checkers say about scale and impact
PolitiFact’s framing for 2025 — naming it “the Year of the Lies” — emphasizes scale and societal harm rather than a single tally, arguing falsehoods were repeated, demonstrably false and consequential [1][2]. Columnists and fact‑check series such as Glenn Kessler’s “Top Ten Lies of 2025” demonstrate newsroom efforts to summarize high‑impact patterns rather than offer a literal count, underscoring the prevalence of repeated false claims on economy, tariffs and other topics [4][5].
3. Examples journalists and fact‑checkers repeatedly flag
Multiple outlets cite recurring themes: false claims about economic indicators (prices and inflation), misleading statements about tariffs and trade impacts, false narratives about election fraud, and inaccurate portrayals of policy outcomes and foreign affairs. Glenn Kessler’s list and CNN’s analysis document examples from 2025 where Trump contradicted available data on inflation and prices and made claims about tariffs’ beneficiaries that experts dispute [4][6][5].
4. Repetition matters as much as quantity
Fact‑checking sources emphasize repetition — saying the same demonstrable falsehood many times — as a core problem. PolitiFact’s editorial choice to call 2025 a “Year of the Lies” reflects concern that repeated falsehoods amplify harm; individual lies like claims about Project 2025 ties or border statistics were repeated and later debunked, making frequency a key dimension distinct from raw counts [7][8][2].
5. Competing perspectives and implicit agendas in the record
Media outlets and partisan actors frame the issue differently. Fact‑checkers and mainstream news organizations document and catalog falsehoods [3][4][6]. Political opponents and party organs highlight deception to score political points; for example, the Democratic National Committee emphasizes alleged lies about Project 2025 to criticize staffing choices [9]. Readers should note sources’ institutional perspectives when weighing emphasis and selection of examples [1][9].
6. What the major compilations actually provide
Wikipedia maintains an extensive running list of false or misleading statements attributed to Trump — useful for seeing breadth and longevity but compiled under editorial norms that differ from dedicated fact‑checking methodologies [3]. PolitiFact and columnists such as Glenn Kessler synthesize the year’s most consequential deceptions and rate claims, focusing on impact and verifiability rather than producing a single cumulative number [4][1].
7. How to interpret the absence of a single number
Available sources show a clear, repeated pattern of demonstrable falsehoods and high rates of misinformation tied to Trump’s public statements, yet none claims a definitive global tally; that absence is meaningful: counting lies is methodological and normative, not merely arithmetic, and the record prioritizes examples, patterns and harms over a final count [3][2].
8. Bottom line for readers
If your goal is a metric, consult specific databases (Wikipedia’s compilation, PolitiFact’s archives, Glenn Kessler’s columns) and be explicit about your counting rules; if your goal is judgment about truthfulness and impact, available reporting documents persistent, repeated falsehoods across policy areas in 2025 and earlier, a pattern editors labeled consequential enough to dub 2025 a “Year of the Lies” [3][4][1]. Available sources do not present a single, universally accepted numeric total answering “How many times has Trump lied?” [3][1].