Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
How many women have publicly accused Trump of misconduct since his presidency?
Executive Summary
At least mid‑to‑high‑twenties women appear in contemporary counts alleging sexual misconduct by Donald Trump, but published tallies vary widely across outlets and dates: several recent compilations list 27–28 named accusers, while other reporting has aggregated broader categories to reach figures as high as 69. The divergence reflects differing definitions of “misconduct,” the time period counted, and whether reports include uncorroborated allegations, civil claims, or broader categories such as harassment, assault, and consensual disputes, so any single number should be treated as a working range rather than a definitive total [1] [2] [3].
1. A Numbers Puzzle: Why Counts Diverge and What Reporters Found
Contemporary reporting shows substantial disagreement over the total number of women who have publicly accused Trump of sexual misconduct, with three clustered tallies and at least one outlier. Several sources that compiled lists around 2024–2025 put the count at 27–28 named women and treat those as direct allegations of sexual harassment, groping or assault [1] [2]. Earlier compilations and some news organizations referenced smaller lists—about two dozen or about 18—reflecting selective inclusion criteria such as limiting to allegations made since his presidency or excluding certain categories of claims [4] [5]. One article explicitly expanded the definition and reported as many as 69 women when counting a broader sweep of incidents and sources, illustrating that methodology drives the headline number [3]. These differences show reporters rarely disagree on whether particular named women made allegations; they disagree on whether to include peripheral claims, allegations from earlier decades, or less‑detailed accounts.
2. Who’s Counted: Definitions, Timeframes, and Inclusion Rules Matter
The counts reflect different definitions of misconduct and varying cutoff dates. Some lists compile allegations “since the 1970s” or “dating back decades,” thereby including incidents from long before Trump’s presidency; other pieces explicitly track accusations that surfaced during or after his time in office, or that were publicized in the 2016 campaign cycle and later [2] [6] [5]. The higher tallies often include a wider range of behaviors—unwanted kissing, groping, verbal harassment, alleged affairs, payments related to nondisclosure, and even historical incidents—whereas smaller tallies may restrict to claims categorized as sexual assault or those pursued with legal action [3] [4]. Reporters also disagree on whether to include allegations that have not been detailed publicly or that come from secondary reporting; this difference in scope explains much of the numerical spread among reputable outlets [1] [2].
3. Legal Outcomes and Notable Cases That Anchor the Lists
Several high‑profile legal cases and publicized incidents serve as anchor points for these tallies, but they also produce inconsistent summaries in reporting. E. Jean Carroll’s civil case is frequently cited: one account describes a jury finding Trump liable and awarding $5 million in damages for sexual abuse and defamation, while other reports list substantially larger awards or aggregated sums over multiple judgments [2] [6]. Stormy Daniels’ payment and ensuing litigation are commonly included as a form of alleged misconduct or related cover‑up payment; Summer Zervos, Natasha Stoynoff, Jessica Leeds, Rachel Crooks, and others have been repeatedly named in lists compiled by multiple outlets [2] [4] [5]. The legal record is patchwork: some allegations produced civil judgments, some generated defamation suits, and many remain publicly alleged without criminal convictions, which creates legitimate complexity when counting and characterizing outcomes [2] [6].
4. Recent Additions and the Role of Media Waves in Raising Counts
Several sources published in 2024 and 2025 note that the rolling total rose as new accusers were reported and as older accounts were re‑examined. The addition of a recently publicized accuser, Stacey Williams, in late 2024 was highlighted as moving some tallies to 27 or 28, reflecting incremental growth in named allegations [7] [1]. Meanwhile, retrospective pieces that cast a wider net—sometimes motivated by cultural context, renewed investigations, or advocacy reporting—produced higher aggregated figures such as 69, signaling an editorial choice to include looser categories of misconduct or less substantiated accounts [3]. These patterns show that the total is not static: media attention cycles, new reporting, and differing editorial judgments all influence the publicly reported number.
5. Bottom Line: A Reasoned Range and the Caveats You Need
The most consistent, recent mainstream tallies converge on a range of roughly 25–28 named women, with multiple outlets repeating those figures in late‑2024 and 2025 compilations [1] [2]. That range is the best single snapshot for readers seeking a compact answer, but it comes with strong caveats: higher counts exist when including a broader set of incidents, historical allegations, or less‑detailed claims [3]. Legal outcomes are mixed, with a few civil judgments but many public allegations without criminal convictions; reporting discrepancies over award amounts and case characterizations illustrate the need to consult primary court records for precise legal facts [2] [6]. Use the 25–28 range as a working figure while recognizing that methodological choices can expand or contract that number substantially [1] [3].