Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
How many women have publicly accused Donald Trump of sexual misconduct and what are the main allegations?
Executive summary
Reporting and compiled lists count at least “more than 25” to “28+” women who have publicly accused Donald Trump of sexual misconduct across decades; major outlets and compilations cite numbers such as “at least 25,” “28,” or “more than 27” depending on scope and date [1] [2] [3]. The allegations range from unwanted kissing and groping to claims of sexual assault and rape; one civil jury found Trump liable for sexually abusing columnist E. Jean Carroll and for defamation, and other accounts describe non‑consensual touching, groping, and walking in on naked contestants [4] [2] [1].
1. How many accusers have been publicly named — counts and why they vary
Different outlets and compilations give different totals: Wikipedia’s aggregated page cites “at least 25” women and in other passages references “28” or higher depending on updates [1]; The Guardian’s timeline lists “more than 27” or compiles dozens of claims [3] [2]. Those variations reflect decisions by journalists and researchers about whether to include allegations reported only in books, anonymous court filings, or dismissed lawsuits — for example, the 2019 book All the President’s Women collected dozens of additional accounts that expand some tallies [1] [5]. Available sources do not provide a single definitive, universally agreed number; each source documents its own scope and criteria [1] [2] [3].
2. The core categories of allegations reported
Reporting groups the accusations into several recurring types: non‑consensual kissing and groping (multiple accounts), unwanted sexual touching in public or private settings, alleged sexual assault and rape (as asserted by some women), and claims of inappropriate behavior around young contestants or minors [2] [1]. Journalistic timelines and legal coverage emphasize patterns such as groping at events, intrusive sexual comments and actions, and, in at least one adjudicated case, sexual abuse as found by a civil jury [2] [4] [1].
3. The most legally consequential allegation: E. Jean Carroll
Columnist E. Jean Carroll sued, and in 2023 a New York jury found Trump civilly liable for sexually abusing her in the mid‑1990s and for defamation; the jury awarded Carroll damages — a verdict widely reported and cited as an adjudicated instance of sexual abuse [4]. That civil finding is distinct from criminal liability: the verdict was in a civil case, and Trump denied the allegations [4]. Sources emphasize this verdict as a legally significant outcome amid a larger set of public accusations [4].
4. Broader compilations and books that expanded counts
Investigative projects and books have added numerous accounts beyond those widely covered in news stories. For instance, the book All the President’s Women reportedly compiled dozens of additional allegations and interviews that increased some tallies [1] [5]. The 19th’s consolidated history pulls together allegations connected to Trump and associates, showing how research projects and longform reporting aggregate claims that might not appear in single news stories [5].
5. Denials, political framing, and competing narratives
Trump and his spokespeople have consistently denied the allegations, calling them politically motivated and “unequivocally false” in some instances, and the White House at times promoted the view that accusers were lying [2] [1]. At the same time, journalists and legal reporting highlight the existence of both adjudicated findings and a wide range of untested claims — a contrast that drives partisan framing: defenders stress denials and legal technicalities, while critics emphasize patterns and the number of allegations [4] [2] [1].
6. Important limitations in the public record
Available sources document many named allegations but do not produce a single authoritative master list with uniform inclusion criteria; counts vary based on whether reporting includes anonymous allegations, dismissed filings, book‑reported claims, or litigated cases [1] [6] [5]. Some legal filings were dismissed or withdrawn and are described in later reporting [6]. Where sources explicitly adjudicated a claim (E. Jean Carroll’s civil verdict), reporting notes that outcome; for other allegations, available sources document public accusations or book reporting rather than court findings [4] [1].
7. Why this matters beyond counting names
Journalists and researchers argue that counting individual claims is part of assessing potential patterns of behavior and institutional responses; law scholars have called for deeper inquiries and reports to contextualize allegations and the obstacles to legal remedy [7]. Simultaneously, political actors use the counts and the most salient legal outcomes to advance competing narratives ahead of public and electoral debates [7] [2].
If you want, I can produce a consolidated list of named accusers and the specific allegations attributed to each person as documented in these sources, with source‑by‑source citations and notes on legal outcomes and where claims were reported only in books or dismissed filings (based on [1], [2], [5], [4], p1_s8).