Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
How much burisma in ukraine pays hunter biden monthly
Executive summary
Reporting and public records disagree on any single “monthly” figure for what Burisma paid Hunter Biden; major outlets and fact-checkers report figures ranging from about $50,000 a month to payment records showing $83,333 per month to a company tied to his partners, while no available records show Burisma directly paying Hunter Biden himself [1] [2] [3]. Some claims of much larger or multimillion-dollar bribes have been discredited or tied to a convicted informant [4] [5].
1. What the mainstream reporting actually says about monthly payments
Several reputable news organizations and fact-checkers describe Hunter Biden’s Burisma compensation as “as much as $50,000 a month,” a figure cited by The New York Times and repeated by outlets such as Axios and RFE/RL; those pieces also stress that the payments were to entities connected to Biden rather than necessarily direct payroll deposits from Burisma into his personal account [3] [6] [7].
2. The Rosomont Seneca / payment-record nuance that causes confusion
Reuters reviewed payment records that showed Burisma sent about $3.4 million between April 2014 and November 2015 to Rosemont Seneca Bohai LLC, a company linked to Hunter Biden’s associates, and documented two monthly payments of $83,333 labeled as “consulting services” over 18 months; Reuters said it could not independently verify the documents or exactly how much Hunter Biden personally received [2]. Fact-checkers note that bank records show Rosemont Seneca Bohai received Burisma funds, but available financial records do not show Burisma directly paying Hunter Biden [1].
3. Why different figures—$50k, $83k, $183k, $1M—circulate
Different numbers come from different sources and methods: the “up to $50,000” line traces to reporting about payments reaching that level to individuals associated with Biden [6]; the $83,333 figure comes from published payment records to a company linked to Biden’s business partner, with two monthly payments per period that some sources attributed—without independent verification—as split between partners [2]. Political claims such as $183,000 per month or $1 million per year have circulated in partisan contexts but rely on unverified assertions or interpretations of documents and have been challenged by fact-checkers [8] [9].
4. Claims of multimillion-dollar bribes and how they fared
Allegations that Burisma paid Hunter and Joe Biden $5 million each were part of a narrative pushed by an FBI informant whose statements were later found to be false; prosecutors charged the informant for lying about those claims [4]. The broader “Biden–Ukraine” conspiracy theory has been characterized in some reporting and compilations as a series of false or unproven allegations [5].
5. What investigations, fact-checks and official sources say about direct payment evidence
Multiple fact-checking organizations and major outlets emphasize that there are no available financial records showing Burisma directly paid Hunter Biden. Instead, records show payments to intermediary firms [1] [2]. Congressional releases and oversight materials have produced memos and bank notes alleging transfers, but those are contested, and media outlets typically treat them as part of an incomplete paper trail rather than definitive proof of Hunter Biden’s direct monthly take from Burisma [10].
6. Conflicting agendas and why this story remains politically charged
Republican investigators and some congressional releases have framed payment memos as evidence of impropriety, while mainstream newsrooms and fact-checkers have highlighted gaps and lack of verification; outlets such as The Guardian and TIME also reported the $50,000-a-month characterization but stressed the political sensitivity and lack of proof that Joe Biden’s official actions were influenced by his son [11] [12]. The involvement of intermediaries, partisan actors, and later discredited informants illustrates how competing agendas have amplified differing figures [4] [5].
7. Bottom line for readers seeking a single monthly number
Available reporting does not support a single uncontested monthly payment figure paid directly from Burisma into Hunter Biden’s personal account. The most widely cited, verifiable formulations are (a) “as much as $50,000 a month” as reported by outlets relying on contemporaneous reporting [6] [3], and (b) payments of $83,333 per month to Rosemont Seneca Bohai in certain months, which some sources say were split between associates, but which Reuters could not independently verify as Hunter Biden’s direct income [2] [1].
Limitations: available sources do not mention a definitive payroll record showing Burisma paying Hunter Biden personally; many public claims rely on intermediaries, contested memos, or unverified documents [1] [2].