Did Hugo Carvajal release names of senators
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
There is no reliable evidence that Hugo Carvajal has publicly released a vetted list naming U.S. senators who took payments from the Maduro government or associated drug-trafficking networks; sensational claims circulated on partisan websites and social platforms lack corroboration in mainstream reporting and fact-checking [1] [2] [3]. Carvajal has produced a letter and made broad allegations about payments to U.S. diplomats and intelligence officers, and he remains a potentially important witness in U.S. cases related to Venezuela, but the specific “Venezuela list” of named U.S. senators has not been produced in verifiable form [4] [5].
1. The claim and where it first surfaced
The most prominent version of the story — that Carvajal “released” a full list of U.S. senators who accepted millions in kickbacks — appears to have originated and spread through partisan outlets and social posts, including a conservative-leaning website and reposts on platforms such as BitChute and X, which amplified an image of a so-called “Venezuela List” without primary-document evidence [2] [3].
2. What independent fact-checkers and mainstream outlets found
Fact-checking by Snopes concluded it found no evidence that Carvajal released any list implicating U.S. senators or other federal lawmakers, and noted that a December letter attributed to Carvajal — circulated via an attorney and reported by outlets such as the Dallas Express and the Miami Herald — did not include a roster of named U.S. politicians [1]. Snopes and its summary on Threads specifically found the “Venezuela list” claims to be unfounded in available documentation [6] [1].
3. What Carvajal has said or provided, according to reporting
Reporting in the Miami Herald documents that Carvajal, a former head of Venezuelan military intelligence nicknamed “El Pollo,” wrote a letter alleging that the Venezuelan government paid U.S. diplomats and CIA officers and made other sweeping intelligence claims, and that he has access to sensitive state secrets from his time in intelligence [4]. Those allegations are broad and contested, and the publicly available letter as reported does not present a verified list of U.S. senators receiving kickbacks [4] [1].
4. Legal context and incentives to produce testimony
Carvajal pleaded guilty to U.S. drug-trafficking charges, placing him in the position of a cooperative witness whose conviction and sentencing schedule could be affected by willingness to testify against higher-profile defendants; Newsweek and legal commentators have signaled that prosecutors often delay sentencing co-conspirators when they anticipate testimony, making him potentially valuable to U.S. cases against Venezuelan officials [5]. That legal posture creates an incentive for prosecutors to extract usable, corroborated testimony, but it does not equate to the public release of a vetted list of U.S. senators [5].
5. Motives, misinformation risks and reporting limitations
The surge of claims naming senators has clear partisan and amplification pathways: fringe or partisan outlets benefit from sensational “bombshell” narratives that mobilize audiences, while social reposts lack document-level verification; Snopes and mainstream outlets explicitly flagged the absence of corroborating evidence [2] [1] [3]. Reporting limitations remain: public sources confirm Carvajal’s allegations in broad strokes and his legal status, but they do not show a verified, public release of named U.S. senators, and available sources do not permit a definitive ruling about any sealed or classified disclosures that could exist beyond the public record [4] [7].