Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500

Fact check: How does the number of ICE agent deaths compare to other law enforcement agencies in 2024?

Checked on October 16, 2025

Executive Summary

Available 2024 data show a clear increase in U.S. law enforcement deaths during 2024 compared with 2023, but public federal reports cited here do not provide a straightforward count of ICE agent line-of-duty deaths for 2024 to enable a direct apples-to-apples comparison. National-level tallies report mid-year and partial-year increases (15% mid-year; 54 felonious deaths through September), while an ICE historical account lists 25 line-of-duty deaths across its history, not limited to 2024, leaving the question of 2024-specific ICE fatalities unresolved by these sources [1] [2] [3] [4].

1. What claimants said — the headline assertions that matter

Analysts summarized three recurring claims: overall law enforcement deaths rose in 2024 versus 2023 (mid-year and partial-year FBI counts), firearms were a leading cause, and published FBI/NLEOMF releases do not enumerate ICE-specific 2024 deaths, impeding direct comparisons. The National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial Fund (NLEOMF) reported 71 deaths in mid-2024 and framed it as a 15% increase; the FBI reported 47 felonious deaths through August and 54 through September 2024, both indicating year-over-year increases [1] [2] [3].

2. National tallies: the scale of 2024’s rise in officer deaths

NLEOMF’s mid-year report and FBI monthly summaries converge on an upward trend: 71 line-of-duty deaths by mid-2024 and a rise in felonious deaths to 54 by September, with firearms responsible for a large share of felonious killings in the FBI breakdowns. This consistency across NLEOMF and FBI partial-year releases documents a measurable increase in risk to law enforcement overall in 2024, but these numbers are aggregate across many agencies and jurisdictions, not broken down to specific federal components such as ICE [1] [2] [3].

3. ICE data delivered historically, not contemporaneously — a crucial gap

The ICE/Homeland Security Investigations material in the set reports 25 line-of-duty deaths historically for that component, citing causes such as 9/11-related illness, aircraft accidents, and gunfire, but this is an aggregate historical figure, not a 2024 count. That disconnect is pivotal: the ICE number cannot be used to compare to the 2024 national increases unless ICE releases a separate, date-specific tally for 2024 fatalities [4]. The absence of a 2024 ICE-specific figure in these sources is the main barrier to a conclusive comparison.

4. Differences in scope and timing explain apparent contradictions

The FBI updates (through August and through September) and the NLEOMF mid-year release measure slightly different windows and definitions — some counts are felonious-only, others include accidental or medical line-of-duty deaths — producing different totals [5] [6] [7]. These methodological choices affect comparability and illustrate why agency-level historical counts (ICE) cannot be directly plugged into national partial-year tallies without alignment on period, classification, and inclusion criteria [1] [2] [3].

5. What causes were emphasized — where the danger came from

Across the FBI and NLEOMF summaries, firearms dominate felonious deaths, with the FBI noting firearms used in roughly three-quarters of felonious killings through September and NLEOMF highlighting 28 firearms-related deaths by mid-year. ICE’s historical list also includes gunfire among causes but does not indicate whether gunfire-related ICE deaths contributed to the 2024 national uptick, leaving causation at the system level documented but ICE-specific causal links unestablished [1] [3] [4].

6. Multiple perspectives and agency agendas — why sources emphasize different points

NLEOMF presents a mortality-focused advocacy angle emphasizing overall increases and causes, while FBI releases aim to provide law-enforcement statistical surveillance with monthly updates; ICE material memorializes component-specific fallen personnel. Each has an institutional purpose that shapes presentation: advocacy, statistical reporting, and internal commemoration respectively, which partly explains why an ICE 2024-specific fatality number is absent from the national reporting cited here [1] [2] [4].

7. Bottom line: what can be stated as fact and what remains unanswered

Factually, law enforcement deaths increased in 2024 versus 2023 per NLEOMF and FBI partial-year reports, and firearms were a leading cause [1] [2] [3]. Factually, ICE’s public material in this set lists 25 historical line-of-duty deaths but does not provide a 2024-specific death count, so a direct comparison of 2024 ICE agent deaths versus other agencies is not supported by the provided sources. To complete the comparison, a 2024 ICE-specific line-of-duty fatality report aligned to NLEOMF/FBI definitions and time windows is required [4] [1].

Want to dive deeper?
What were the leading causes of death for ICE agents in 2024?
How does the number of ICE agent deaths in 2024 compare to the overall number of law enforcement officer deaths in the US?
Which law enforcement agency had the highest number of officer deaths in 2024?
What safety protocols are in place to protect ICE agents during operations?
How do ICE agent death rates compare to those of other federal law enforcement agencies, such as the FBI or US Marshals?