Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: How does the ICE agent salary compare to other federal law enforcement agencies in 2025?
Executive summary
ICE agent pay in 2025 sits within the federal Law Enforcement Officer (LEO) pay framework but shows wide reported ranges and aggressive recruitment incentives that make direct comparisons to other federal agencies complicated. Core base pay aligns with OPM LEO tables, while ICE-specific sign‑on bonuses, locality pay, Law Enforcement Availability Pay (LEAP), and advertised higher starting ranges for certain hires push total compensation above many peer agencies in some locations and job grades [1] [2] [3].
1. Why ICE pay looks inconsistent and what the official baseline says
Official federal pay rules place ICE agents in the LEO pay system managed by OPM, which sets grade/step rates plus locality adjustments; the 2025 LEO table shows a general increase and locality payments that affect pay significantly [1] [4]. That OPM framework is the baseline for all federal law enforcement salaries, meaning ICE isn’t outside the federal pay grid but is subject to the same grade/step mechanics as other agencies. Reports citing varied starting salaries therefore reflect different grade assignments, locality pay, overtime, and additional LEAP percentages, not a separate ICE-only scale [1] [5].
2. What multiple sources report about ICE salary ranges in 2025
Public reporting shows several different ICE salary ranges: one summary lists entry-level $48,371–$77,210 and experienced up to $167,603 [6], another ICE recruitment posting from July 2025 advertised $88,621–$144,031 plus up to $50,000 sign‑on for returning officers [3], and agency communications gave ranges like $49,739–$89,528 in 2025 adverts [7] [5]. These discrepancies reflect different cohorts—new hires, rehires, locality-adjusted salaries, and advertised recruitment packages—rather than contradictory legal pay tables [6] [7].
3. How bonuses and incentives change the headline numbers
ICE has been offering robust incentives in 2025 that alter take‑home compensation: sign‑on bonuses up to $50,000, student loan repayment, and recruitment incentives including 25% LEAP and other allowances [2] [3]. When agencies advertise “six‑figure” pay, they often combine base pay, locality, LEAP, overtime projections, and one‑time bonuses. That inflates comparisons with agencies that may offer similar base rates but fewer or smaller hiring incentives. Several sources note ICE explicitly used these incentives during a large 2025 hiring push [2].
4. How ICE stacks up against peer federal agencies under identical rules
Because ICE agents follow OPM’s LEO pay tables, differences between ICE and other federal law enforcement agencies largely come from grade assignments, locality pay, and available incentives. Where ICE assigns recruits to higher GS/LEO grades or targets high‑cost localities, advertised pay can exceed peers; where grades or locality are lower, pay is comparable or below [1] [4]. Special rates for critical recruitment needs in 2026 could further shift relative positions if applied unevenly across agencies [8] [9].
5. What the timing and political context suggest about reported pay spikes
Several reports and official notices from 2025 link higher ICE pay offers to aggressive recruitment campaigns amid high applicant volumes and political focus on border enforcement, creating incentives to advertise enhanced pay packages [2] [3]. This context implies some headline increases reflect short‑term recruitment tactics rather than permanent structural raises across federal LEO pay. Proposed federal pay adjustments for 2026—smaller across‑the‑board raises but higher increases for some law enforcement roles—could alter longer‑term comparisons [9].
6. What’s omitted from many public comparisons and why it matters
Many public summaries omit consistent accounting for LEAP (25% availability pay), overtime, locality differentials, retirement and health benefits, and one‑time sign‑on amounts—factors that materially alter total compensation [2] [5]. Comparisons that quote only base-grade rates without these elements misrepresent what agents actually earn or can expect, especially in urban high‑cost areas where locality pay is large. Analysts and applicants should demand apples‑to‑apples comparisons that state base grade, locality, LEAP, typical overtime, and any bonus.
7. Bottom line: comparable pay but recruitment incentives create headline differences
Under the OPM LEO framework ICE pay is broadly comparable to other federal law enforcement agencies at equal grades and localities, but ICE’s 2025 recruitment bonuses, advertised higher starting bands for certain hires, and LEAP/overtime practices produced headline compensation that can exceed many peers in practice in targeted locations [1] [2]. Readers should treat reported ranges as composite figures reflecting base pay plus incentives and verify grade, locality, and one‑time offers when making direct agency‑to‑agency comparisons [6] [4].