Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: What were the ICE arrest numbers in 2024 for comparison?
Executive Summary
ICE reported 113,431 interior arrests in Fiscal Year 2024, a 33.5% drop from FY 2023, while recording 271,484 removals, the highest annual removals in a decade, with over 30% of removals tied to criminal convictions or charges. These headline numbers come from ICE’s FY2024 report and are corroborated and interrogated by multiple advocacy, media, and research groups that stress different aspects—enforcement volume, criminality share, and whether the figures constitute a true escalation compared with prior administrations [1] [2] [3].
1. Why the 113,431 Arrests Figure Is the Central Claim That Needs Context
ICE’s Fiscal Year 2024 Annual Report lists 113,431 interior arrests, framed as a notable decline of 33.5% from FY2023, and the agency highlights its prioritization of public-safety threats among those arrested. The raw arrest count is explicit, but the number alone omits operational distinctions—ICE separates interior arrests from border apprehensions and counts arrests of noncitizens already in custody for other crimes. The report also notes that 81,312 of these arrested noncitizens had criminal convictions or pending charges, which ICE uses to justify targeted enforcement [1]. Critics argue the decline signals shifting priorities or resource allocations rather than decreased enforcement activity overall [4].
2. How Removal Totals [5] [6] Complicate the “Arrests” Narrative
ICE’s reported 271,484 removals in FY2024 are presented as a ten-year high and are emphasized by media coverage that frames the fiscal year as exceptional in deportations. These removals include many migrants apprehended by Customs and Border Protection at the border as well as interior removals, which means removal totals cannot be read as a direct function of interior arrests alone. ICE’s own breakdown shows a large share of removals involved individuals with criminal histories—88,763 with criminal histories in one reporting set—which the agency highlights as evidence of focused public-safety enforcement [1] [7] [8].
3. Competing Interpretations: Are These Numbers an “Increase” or a Reversion to Prior Peaks?
Multiple outlets call FY2024 removals a record for the decade, comparing the 271,484 figure to earlier peaks such as FY2019. Proponents of heightened enforcement portray the number as a rebound or surpassing of previous peaks. Conversely, independent researchers like TRAC argue that when contextualized against multi-year trends, enforcement metrics do not uniformly indicate a unilateral increase in arrests and removals under the most recent administration compared with the prior administration’s FY2024 record; methodological differences—counting arrests versus removals, distinguishing border versus interior actions—drive divergent interpretations [2] [3] [7].
4. Methodology Matters: Arrests vs. Removals vs. Apprehensions
ICE’s statistics and external analyses repeatedly stress that “arrests” and “removals” are different metrics with distinct operational inputs. Interior arrests measure actions taken within the country by ICE enforcement teams, whereas removals include deportations following administrative or judicial proceedings and often result from Border Patrol apprehensions. Quarterly internal reports for FY2024 show dramatic quarter-to-quarter shifts—nearly 70% increases in certain quarters’ removals compared to the prior year—underscoring that quarterly operational surges can inflate annual removal totals without a corresponding rise in interior arrests [9] [4].
5. What Different Sources Emphasize—and Why Their Agendas Matter
ICE and allied voices emphasize the criminal history share of arrests and removals to frame enforcement as public-safety focused; this is reflected in ICE’s highlighting of 81,312 arrested noncitizens with convictions/pending charges and 88,763 removals of individuals with criminal histories [1]. Advocacy groups and independent researchers stress declines in interior arrests as evidence of policy shifts or reduced interior footprint, and some media outlets highlight the decade-high removals to suggest enforcement intensification. Each source selection signals an agenda: enforcement justification, civil-rights scrutiny, or broader political framing [4] [3] [2].
6. Where the Data Leave Open Questions for Further Investigation
The headline numbers are verifiable within ICE’s published report, but several important gaps remain: the split between border-origin and interior-origin removals, the precise reasons for the 33.5% drop in arrests (policy change, resource redirection, or operational constraints), and long-term trend comparisons that adjust for procedural changes across fiscal years. TRAC’s February 2025 analysis urges caution in declaring simple increases or decreases without standardized definitions and cross-year normalization, reinforcing the need for granular, time-series data to settle comparative claims [3] [9].
7. Bottom Line: What the 2024 Numbers Actually Tell Us
ICE’s FY2024 data establish three clear facts: 113,431 interior arrests, a 33.5% decline from the prior year, and 271,484 removals, the highest in a decade with a significant share tied to criminal records. Interpreting whether enforcement “increased” or “decreased” depends on whether analysts focus on interior arrests, total removals, quarter-to-quarter surges, or the criminality composition of those removed. Policy debates should therefore proceed from these verified figures while acknowledging methodological distinctions and the diverse emphases different stakeholders bring to the same datasets [1] [2].