Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: How do the salary scales of ICE and Border Patrol agents change with experience and rank in 2025?
Executive Summary
ICE Special Agent and deportation officer pay in 2025 centers roughly on mid-five-figure to low-six-figure annual ranges, while Border Patrol agent pay broadly spans low five figures up to the high end of six figures depending on grade, overtime, and bonuses. Recruitment drives, bonus programs, and return-to-work rules materially affect take-home and effective compensation, even as agencies report hiring shortfalls and operational strain [1] [2] [3] [4] [5].
1. What advocates and data actually claim about ICE pay — a clearer picture emerges
Public salary compilations indicate a Special Agent at ICE averages about $110,853, with reported ranges from approximately $96,199 to $134,483, reflecting geographic and qualification variation and departmental budget factors [1]. For deportation officers, available figures place salaries between about $49,739 and $89,528, with overtime and retention incentives described by agencies and reporting as potentially large contributors to annual totals [3]. Return-to-work rules for retired ICE employees set pay by the Highest Previous Rate and preserve some benefits, which can raise effective pay for experienced hires returning under the Return to Mission program [5].
2. Border Patrol pay ranges and how rank/experience move the needle
Compilations for 2025 show a Border Patrol Agent average near $73,076, with entry-level starts around $57,761 and ranges extending up to $177,000 for high earners, driven by grade, locality pay, overtime, and long service [2]. Federal general schedule (GL) entry grades for new agents are reported as GL-5 or GL-7, placing base pay in roughly the $40,000–$90,000 bracket before premium pays and overtime [6]. Experience and rank correlate with GL step increases and eligibility for premium pay, producing substantial variation in realized pay across agents and locations [6] [2].
3. Bonuses, overtime and location differentials reshape headline figures
Multiple sources document large hiring and location bonuses that materially alter annual compensation: ICE offered up to $50,000 for recruit bonuses in some programs, and Border Patrol offered $20,000 for new hires plus additional payments for service in remote locations [3] [4]. Overtime, surge assignments, and remote-station differentials frequently explain why top-end reported salaries exceed base GL ranges, and they are major tools agencies use to attract and retain staff. These add-ons create a bifurcated pay reality where base pay is moderate but total compensation can be substantially higher.
4. Hiring drives and operational friction — compensation in context
Both ICE and Border Patrol are described as aggressively expanding headcount in 2025, with ICE targeting large increases and Border Patrol relying on bonuses to grow ranks [7] [4]. Reporting flags recruitment challenges — lower-quality applicant pools, fitness and background shortfalls, and operational strain in onboarding — which intersect with compensation programs and may pressure agencies to widen bonuses or relax some hiring filters [7] [8]. This dynamic can raise short-term payroll costs and influence the composition of entry cohorts, affecting long-term workforce quality.
5. Return-to-work rules and retirement interplay change effective earnings for veterans
ICE’s Return to Mission program allows retirees to return with pay set by the Highest Previous Rate while retaining Federal Employees’ Health Benefits but not accruing Thrift Savings Plan contributions, which creates a particular compensation profile for experienced rehires [5]. This policy can make returning veterans among the highest-paid active personnel, since prior top-step salaries carry forward; however, limitations on retirement contributions and specific leave/coverage rules alter net financial incentives. The policy is a targeted lever to fill gaps rapidly with seasoned personnel.
6. Comparing agencies: where pay overlaps and where it diverges
ICE Special Agents sit near the upper-middle of the reported pay spectrum (averaging low six figures), while Border Patrol agents show a broader spread from low base grades to high realized totals driven by overtime and bonuses [1] [2]. Deportation officers at ICE generally fall below Special Agents but can reach substantial totals via overtime and hiring incentives [3]. The biggest divergence is structural: ICE uses position-based top-rate settings and return-to-work provisions, while Border Patrol relies more heavily on GL grade progression and large recruitment/location bonuses [5] [6] [4].
7. What’s missing, and why figures should be used carefully
Open-source summaries and reporting provide ranges and averages but omit consistent, agency-wide breakdowns of base pay vs. overtime vs. bonus vs. locality, and they vary on date ranges and sampling methods. Key omissions include precise GL-step tables, locality pay schedules for specific duty stations, and aggregated overtime averages, which are essential to convert reported ranges into predictable career earnings [6] [1]. Given hiring turbulence and ad hoc bonuses in 2025, any single headline figure risks misrepresenting typical take-home pay; comparisons should rely on detailed grade/step and locality data for precise career modeling.