Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
What is the breakdown of ICE's budget by major programs?
Executive summary
Congress and the White House activity in mid‑2025 dramatically changed the scale of funding available to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE): the FY2026 baseline request to Congress was $11.3 billion (21,808 positions, 21,786 FTE) while reconciliation and appropriations actions could add tens of billions more—analysts estimate roughly $29–30 billion in extra enforcement/deportation funding or even larger multi‑year sums depending on how the legislation is counted [1] [2] [3]. Coverage differs on how the additional funds are allocated across detention, hiring, and operations, and reporting varies between single‑year and multi‑year totals [2] [4] [5].
1. What ICE’s official FY2026 request actually lists
ICE’s FY2026 Congressional Budget Justification states the agency requested $11.3 billion for FY2026, supporting 21,808 positions and 21,786 full‑time equivalents, and details programmatic needs such as Transportation and Removal, detention operations, and investments in screening and vetting tools [1]. That $11.3 billion is the baseline that ICE presented to Congress for its ordinary annual appropriations [1].
2. How reconciliation/“Big Beautiful Bill” money changed the arithmetic
Multiple outlets and policy groups interpret the summer 2025 reconciliation and related budget actions as adding very large sums for immigration enforcement that are separate from, and additive to, ICE’s baseline budget—estimates cluster around $29–30 billion directed to ICE enforcement and deportation over several years, with some groups and reporting counting larger multi‑agency totals that reach into the tens of billions or more [2] [3] [6]. Jacobin and the Brennan Center analyzed CBO and administration materials and approximated that the reconciliation package could add roughly $19–30 billion to ICE depending on the year and pro‑rata assumptions [2] [3].
3. Where reporters and advocacy groups say the extra money would flow
Different outlets break the additions down differently: reporting and advocacy claims include large earmarks for detention facility construction and operations (figures like $45 billion for detention are cited by several organizations), major allocations for hiring and training (numbers like roughly $8–30 billion for personnel or 10,000 new officers appear in multiple accounts), and separate sums for recruitment/retention bonuses and onboarding (for example, $858 million in retention/signing bonuses and $600 million for recruiting were highlighted) [4] [7] [5]. PBS’s reporting summarized broader budget splits across border wall, detention, hiring, and immigration courts when aggregating the full package [5].
4. Why numbers diverge: timing, accounting, and agency shares
Widespread disagreement in the coverage arises because some outlets treat all funds as counting toward a single fiscal year for scorekeeping even if they are available across multiple years; others present four‑year totals or sum appropriations across several agencies (ICE, CBP, DOJ immigration court support), which inflates the headline figures attributed solely to ICE [2] [3]. Jacobin notes that reconciliation funds are additive to ICE’s regular appropriations and that CBO conventions can front‑load multi‑year authority into one year’s fiscal accounting [2]. Advocacy groups often report multi‑year program totals [3] [8].
5. Concrete program examples that reporting repeatedly cites
Reporting consistently flags three program buckets: detention capacity (construction, operation, daily bed costs), personnel/hiring and retention (including signing bonuses, recruiting campaigns, and plans to hire thousands of officers), and enforcement operations (transportation/removal, detention transfers, and related contracts). Federal News Network and other reporting called out $858 million for retention bonuses and $600 million for recruiting/onboarding as explicit reconciled items aimed at ICE workforce expansion [4] [7].
6. Independent and advocacy takes — and their implicit agendas
Left‑leaning outlets and immigrant‑rights groups emphasize the human‑cost and scale of detention funding (calling out figures like $45 billion for detention and warning of mass deportation capacity), framing the increases as creating a “deportation‑industrial complex” [7] [3]. Some outlet analyses on the other hand emphasize procedural and accounting complexity—how CBO and DHS apportion multi‑year funds—which can moderate headline claims about a single‑year spike [2]. Each source’s emphasis reflects an agenda: watchdog/advocacy groups highlight detention and civil‑liberties impacts, while policy analysts trace budget scoring conventions and programmatic mechanics [3] [2].
7. What reporting does not settle
Available sources do not provide a single, unified line‑item table that reconciles the FY2026 ICE budget request ($11.3B) with every dollar of reconciliation funding allocated to ICE across years into a standardized program‑by‑program breakdown. Reporting provides program examples and contested totals, but a definitive, reconciled budget spreadsheet tying each dollar to ICE sub‑programs in a single year is not available in the cited materials [1] [2] [4].
8. Bottom line for readers
The clear, cited baseline is ICE’s FY2026 request of $11.3 billion with staffing details [1]. Beyond that baseline, reconciliation and appropriations actions introduce tens of billions more for immigration enforcement and detention—estimates and allocations vary significantly by source and by whether funds are counted on a single‑year or multi‑year basis—so any simple headline claiming a single, unambiguous “breakdown” of ICE’s post‑reconciliation budget is not supported by a single authoritative table in current reporting [2] [3] [4].