Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Has the rate of ICE deporting US citizens changed over time?
Executive Summary
The available evidence shows ICE has detained and removed noncitizens in greater numbers at various points since 2002, but direct, reliable measures of ICE deporting U.S. citizens over time are scarce and incomplete. Government and watchdog reviews document dozens to at most a few dozen confirmed or likely wrongful deportations and thousands of cases where U.S. citizens were flagged as potentially removable, with notable spikes and reporting gaps tied to policy periods and data-quality problems [1] [2] [3]. This means claims that ICE broadly increased or decreased deportations of U.S. citizens require careful qualification: errors occur, they cluster in certain years, and public datasets primarily track noncitizen removals rather than systematic, auditable deportations of citizens [4] [5].
1. Why the question matters and what the records actually show — big-picture accountability concerns
Public scrutiny intensified after audits and nonprofit tracking revealed systemic data and training failures that create real risks of U.S. citizens being processed for removal. Government and academic tallies found ICE or its databases named thousands of people as potentially removable citizens between 2002 and 2017, and the Government Accountability Office and other reviews verified dozens of confirmed wrongful deportations or detentions across recent decades [1] [2]. These numbers indicate persistent institutional weaknesses — faulty databases, inconsistent training, and record-keeping gaps — that make trend analysis fraught because the underlying incidence may be undercounted or mischaracterized in official removal statistics [1] [4].
2. What watchdogs and researchers have counted — the headline figures
Independent analyses report up to 70 likely wrongful deportations between 2015 and 2020 and thousands of instances where U.S. citizens were flagged in immigration data as potential removals between 2002 and 2017; one clearinghouse named 2,840 such cases with 214 arrests identified in that window [1] [2]. These counts come from audits, court records, and FOIA-driven datasets rather than ICE’s headline removal totals, and they focus on instances where citizenship status was contested or later found to be U.S. citizenhood. The emphasis in these sources is on errors of identification and process, not on routine, policy-driven deportation of citizens, which remains legally rare but institutionally consequential [1] [2].
3. How official ICE removals data complicate the picture — noncitizen focus and time-limited datasets
ICE’s public Enforcement and Removal Operations statistics and projects like the Deportation Data Project document robust fluctuations in removals and arrests for noncitizens — including a near 70% increase in certain quarters of FY2024 versus FY2023 — but these datasets do not reliably enumerate deportations of citizens and often exclude the kinds of misidentification cases captured by watchdogs [3] [4] [5]. Therefore, the apparent rise or fall in overall removals is not the same as a change in the rate at which U.S. citizens are mistakenly deported, and interpreting ICE’s aggregate numbers as evidence about citizen removals risks conflating distinct phenomena [3] [4].
4. Policy eras, reporting spikes, and where trends appear to shift — timeline nuance
Analyses link periods of intensified enforcement and administrative change to higher incidences of arrests or detentions of potential citizens, with notable reporting around the Trump administration showing increased detention of individuals later identified as citizens and watchdog tallies highlighting concentrated errors in specific time frames [2] [6]. Yet these patterns reflect both operational directives and improved public attention; some apparent increases may result from better detection, litigation, and media scrutiny rather than a true rise in wrongful removals. The persistent caveat across sources is that incomplete records and inconsistent definitions make trend lines provisional [2] [6].
5. Bottom line for the claim and what would be needed to settle it definitively
The claim that “the rate of ICE deporting U.S. citizens changed over time” is partly supported: documented wrongful removals and misidentifications occurred across decades and clustered in certain periods, but high-quality, continuous time-series data specifically quantifying deportations of citizens do not exist in public ICE datasets. Definitive trend assessment would require systematic reconciliation of ICE detention and removal logs with vital records and court outcomes, transparent methodology for counting confirmed wrongful deportations, and routine public reporting on misidentified-citizen cases — reforms recommended by auditors and researchers [1] [4] [5]. Until such reforms, conclusions about directional change remain constrained by data gaps and methodological variation [1] [3].