Is this true: ICE officials have shut down a restaurant owned by a United States citizen after the business put up a “No ICE Welcome”
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
The specific claim that ICE officials "shut down" a restaurant owned by a U.S. citizen because the business posted a “No ICE Welcome” sign is circulating widely online but is not corroborated by authoritative public records or mainstream reporting; the primary sources for the story are social posts and niche outlets repeating an owner’s allegation about an intimidation-style law-enforcement presence at Da Sammich Spot in Memphis [1] [2] [3]. Independent reporting notes there are no publicly available warrants or court records confirming a lawful ICE shutdown tied directly to the sign, and broader, verified coverage of enforcement in cities like Chicago shows a pattern of raids and business owners reacting by posting “ICE not welcome” signs or temporarily closing, but does not establish the Memphis shutdown as verified [1] [4] [5].
1. What the viral claim actually says and where it comes from
The narrative circulating on X, Threads and several entertainment or partisan sites asserts that a heavy contingent of federal and local law enforcement—variously described as ICE, FBI, ATF, National Guard and local police—surrounded and blocked a Memphis sandwich shop called Da Sammich Spot after the owner posted a “No ICE Welcome” or “No ICE Access” sign, and that the business was effectively shut down by that show of force [2] [3] [1]. Those posts include short clips and the owner’s on-camera account that he was “scared for life,” which propelled the story across social feeds [1] [2].
2. What independent reporting and public records show — and don’t show
IBTimes’ reporting expressly flags the absence of corroborating legal documents: as of its account there were no publicly available warrants or court filings confirming an enforcement action at Da Sammich Spot tied to the sign, and it reiterates that ICE generally needs a judicial warrant or voluntary consent to enter non‑public areas of private businesses [1]. The repetition of the episode on Threads and entertainment sites amplifies the claim but does not substitute for independent verification from local mainstream outlets, police statements, or federal press releases that would confirm a lawful shutdown or the legal rationale for any entry [2] [3].
3. Broader context: restaurants, “No ICE” signs, and enforcement patterns
There is an established and documented pattern in 2024–25 of restaurateurs and cafes publicly posting “ICE not welcome” or “Everyone is welcome, except I.C.E.” signs and of businesses temporarily closing or altering operations amid aggressive immigration enforcement; major outlets have reported restaurants in Chicago and other cities taking such steps to protect staff and customers in the wake of raids [4] [5] [6]. Those documented instances show a climate where owners feel under threat and sometimes close proactively, but those verified stories are separate from the Memphis allegation and do not confirm that ICE lawfully shuttered a U.S. citizen’s restaurant for posting a sign [5] [4] [6].
4. How to weigh the evidence and possible agendas behind amplification
The available sources for the Memphis claim are social posts and outlets that echo the owner’s account without corroborating evidence; IBTimes’ caution about the lack of warrants is a crucial counterweight [1] [2] [3]. Social-media virality often compresses nuance and can serve political aims—either to dramatize federal enforcement as heavy-handed or to inflame fears about immigrant-targeted actions—so the provenance and motive of reposts should be considered when judging truth [2] [3]. Absent confirmation from local law-enforcement statements, federal records, or mainstream local reporting explicitly linking ICE action to the sign at Da Sammich Spot, the claim must be treated as unverified rather than established fact [1].