Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: How much does ICE pay for supervisory rolls
1. Summary of the results
Based on the analyses provided, ICE supervisory roles offer substantial compensation packages. The most comprehensive data shows that ICE officers in supervisory positions earn between $88,621 to $144,031 per year [1]. Additionally, returning ICE officers can receive sign-on bonuses of up to $50,000 [1].
For criminal investigators in supervisory capacities, the compensation is even higher, ranging from $105,383 to $171,268 per year [1]. The salary structure also includes locality adjustments and overtime opportunities that can increase total compensation beyond the base salary ranges [2] [3].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
The original question lacks several important contextual factors that significantly impact ICE supervisory compensation:
- Geographic location matters substantially - agents in high-cost regions receive locality adjustments that can increase base pay significantly [2]
- Experience level creates major pay differences - entry-level agents earn around $29,350 annually while top-tier supervisory roles can exceed $76,687 [3]
- Recruitment incentives are currently substantial - ICE is actively offering up to $50,000 signing bonuses specifically to retired employees willing to return [4]
- Overtime opportunities can substantially increase total annual compensation beyond base salary figures [2] [3]
Government agencies and law enforcement organizations benefit from highlighting competitive compensation packages to attract qualified supervisory personnel during recruitment drives. Taxpayer advocacy groups might benefit from emphasizing the high cost of these positions when discussing federal spending priorities.
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original question contains a spelling error ("rolls" instead of "roles") which could indicate casual research or lack of attention to detail. However, the question itself is straightforward and doesn't contain obvious bias.
The question is incomplete in scope as it doesn't specify:
- Whether it's asking about base salary, total compensation, or starting wages
- Geographic considerations that significantly impact pay scales
- Different types of supervisory positions within ICE
- Current recruitment incentives that substantially increase total compensation packages
This lack of specificity could lead to incomplete or misleading answers if not properly contextualized with the additional factors mentioned in the analyses.