Is Ilan Omar an illegal immigrate

1. Who Ilhan Omar is — citizenship and public record

Ilhan Omar is described in mainstream biographies and congressional records as a U.S. Representative from Minnesota who was born in Somalia and later naturalized as a U.S. citizen; her Wikipedia entry lists her as an American politician serving in Congress ^[1]. Congress.gov lists her member activity and bills she has sponsored, which presumes her status as a voting member of the U.S. House ^[5]. Her official House web pages present her policy priorities, including immigration advocacy, and her constituency services include immigration casework assistance ^{[6] [7]}.

2. Allegations and political calls for deportation

Multiple Republican politicians and commentators have publicly called for Omar to be deported or for her citizenship to be revoked; coverage notes these calls as part of political disputes over her comments and activism ^{[3] [8]}. Newsweek reported on Republican talk of deportation and quoted an immigration lawyer saying those calls are legally baseless in the context of political speech ^[2]. The National reported later pushes to revoke citizenship in another political controversy, framing the demands as part of partisan backlash ^[8].

3. What experts and reporting say about deporting a naturalized member of Congress

Legal experts and reporting say deportation of a naturalized U.S. citizen is not straightforward and generally requires grounds such as fraud in the naturalization process or criminal convictions that trigger removal under immigration law; political speech alone is not a lawful basis for deportation, according to an immigration lawyer cited by Newsweek ^[2]. Advocacy and legal analysis pieces also stress that the Immigration and Nationality Act allows denaturalization only in narrow circumstances, making revocation legally complex rather than a simple political remedy ^[4].

4. Omar’s public stance and advocacy on immigration

Omar’s public platform emphasizes immigrant rights, protections like DACA and TPS, and reforming enforcement; her campaign and congressional websites feature immigration policy priorities and services for constituents, demonstrating she is active in immigration policy and casework ^{[6] [9] [7]}. Reporting also includes clips and events where Omar advised community members about dealing with ICE encounters, which became the immediate trigger for renewed calls by some Republicans for punitive action ^{[3] [10]}.

5. Conflicting narratives and political motivations

The demand to remove Omar often comes from partisan opponents and appears tied to political controversies (for example, remarks about foreign policy or videos she shared), suggesting political motivations behind calls for deportation or denaturalization ^{[3] [8]}. Media outlets and legal commentators framed these calls as political theater more than viable legal actions, highlighting the difference between political attacks and enforceable legal processes ^{[2] [4]}.

6. What the provided sources do not cover

Available sources in this set do not provide primary documents proving the specifics of Omar’s naturalization application, official statements from the Department of Justice about any active denaturalization proceedings, or a definitive court ruling stripping her citizenship; those items are not found in the current reporting provided (not found in current reporting). Detailed forensic examination of any alleged irregularities in her naturalization is not present among the supplied items (not found in current reporting).

7. Bottom line for the original question

Based on the provided reporting, Ilhan Omar is a naturalized U.S. citizen and a sitting member of Congress; claims that she is an “illegal immigrant” are contradicted by mainstream biographical and legal reporting and are being used as political attacks rather than established legal facts ^{[1] [5] [2]}. Calls to deport her or revoke citizenship have been made by political opponents, but experts cited in reporting describe such moves as legally limited, complex, and unlikely based solely on political speech ^{[2] [4]}.