Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500

Fact check: What were the key changes in Illinois district maps after the 2020 census?

Checked on August 15, 2025

1. Summary of the results

The key changes in Illinois district maps after the 2020 census were substantial and politically significant. Illinois lost one congressional seat due to population changes, reducing from 18 to 17 representatives [1]. The new congressional map was enacted on November 24, 2021, after Governor J.B. Pritzker signed it into law, with the Illinois State Senate voting 41-18 and the House voting 71-43 in favor [2].

The most dramatic change was the partisan redistribution of seats: Democrats strategically redrew the maps to reduce Republican seats from five to three while increasing Democratic districts to 14 [1]. This resulted in Illinois' Congressional maps receiving an 'F' grade in 2021 due to gerrymandering [3].

Specific district changes included the 9th Congressional District, which now covers parts of Cook, Lake, and McHenry counties, including Chicago, Evanston, Skokie, and several suburban communities, with a population of approximately 740,000 [4]. The three remaining Republican districts became mostly large, meandering rural areas, indicating strategic gerrymandering [5].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The analyses reveal several important contextual elements not addressed in the original question:

  • Political motivations and beneficiaries: The Democratic Party clearly benefited from this redistricting process, as they controlled the state legislature and governorship during the map-drawing process [2] [3]. Governor J.B. Pritzker and Democratic lawmakers gained significant electoral advantages from these changes.
  • National redistricting context: Illinois' redistricting occurred within a broader national battle over congressional maps, with eight states facing complex redistricting challenges including Texas, California, Missouri, Ohio, New York, Indiana, and Florida [1].
  • Gerrymandering criticism: The process faced substantial criticism for being a "gerrymandered map designed to favor Democrats and reduce Republican electoral opportunities" [2]. Republican lawmakers specifically criticized the 2021 congressional map [6].
  • Historical comparison: The sources indicate this was part of Illinois' pattern of controversial redistricting, as the state "last redrew its congressional map in 2021" amid Republican criticism [6].

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question itself appears neutral and factual, asking for objective information about district map changes. However, the question's framing omits several crucial aspects:

  • No mention of the controversial nature: The question doesn't acknowledge that these changes were highly contentious and criticized as partisan gerrymandering [2] [3].
  • Missing the seat loss context: The question doesn't reference that Illinois lost a congressional seat, which was a driving factor behind the redistricting necessity [1].
  • Absence of partisan impact: The question doesn't hint at the significant partisan implications, where Republican representation was reduced from five seats to three while Democratic seats increased to 14 [1] [3].

The question's neutral tone could inadvertently minimize the highly political and controversial nature of Illinois' 2021 redistricting process, which received widespread criticism for partisan gerrymandering.

Want to dive deeper?
How did the 2020 census affect Illinois' congressional representation?
What were the most significant changes to Illinois state legislative districts after the 2020 census?
Which Illinois districts were most impacted by the 2020 census redistricting?
How did the Illinois redistricting process after the 2020 census impact voting demographics?
What role did the Illinois General Assembly play in redrawing district maps after the 2020 census?