Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

Fact check: What role did the Illinois General Assembly play in redrawing district maps in 2021?

Checked on September 10, 2025

1. Summary of the results

The Illinois General Assembly played a role in redrawing district maps in 2021, as stated in multiple analyses [1] [2]. The current process leads to overrepresentation of Democrats and few competitive legislative districts [1]. A group of former Obama administration officials and election lawyers are attempting to reform the way the state draws district maps for the state legislature by passing a state constitutional amendment via a ballot initiative during the 2026 general election [1] [2]. The proposed 12-member Legislative Redistricting Commission would be responsible for drawing the maps, and the initiative would need 320,000 valid signatures to appear on the 2026 November ballot [2]. The federal court upheld the Illinois General Assembly's redistricting plans in December 2021 [3]. The redistricting efforts have resulted in a 5-2 Democratic advantage in the Supreme Court [1] [2].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

Some analyses do not explicitly state the role of the Illinois General Assembly in redrawing district maps in 2021 [4] [5] [6] [7]. However, they imply the General Assembly's involvement in the process by mentioning that legislative maps are drawn in a way that protects the majority party [5] [6]. The goal of taking partisanship out of the process and giving voters a better voice in elections is mentioned in some analyses [7], which could be an alternative viewpoint on the General Assembly's role in redistricting. Additionally, the challenges of adding more Democratic districts in Illinois are discussed in one analysis [4], which could be a missing context in the original statement. The use of population estimates rather than 2020 Census data for redistricting is also mentioned in one analysis [3], which could be a relevant context.

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement does not provide any information about the potential bias in the redistricting process or the overrepresentation of Democrats [1]. The fact that the current process leads to few competitive legislative districts could be seen as a bias in the system, which benefits the Democratic party [1]. The effort to reform the redistricting process through a constitutional amendment could be seen as an attempt to address this bias [1] [2]. The fact that the federal court upheld the Illinois General Assembly's redistricting plans in December 2021 could be seen as a validation of the current process, but it could also be argued that the court's decision was biased [3]. The sources that imply the General Assembly's involvement in the process without explicitly stating it [5] [6] [7] could be seen as having a bias towards the majority party. Overall, the potential misinformation or bias in the original statement could be attributed to the lack of context and alternative viewpoints [4] [5] [6] [7].

Want to dive deeper?
What were the key changes made to Illinois district maps in 2021?
How did the Illinois General Assembly's redistricting process compare to other states in 2021?
What were the implications of the new district maps on the 2022 Illinois elections?
Which Illinois lawmakers played a crucial role in shaping the new district maps?
How did the redistricting process in Illinois address issues of gerrymandering?