Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: How many immigrants entered under president trump in 2016-2020?
Executive Summary
The best available U.S. government tallies show roughly 1.18 million people obtained lawful permanent resident (green card) status in fiscal year 2016 and a steep decline to about 707,362 in fiscal year 2020, reflecting a cumulative drop during the Trump administration driven largely by policy changes and the COVID-19 pandemic [1] [2]. Analysts differ on causes: some emphasize Trump-era restrictions and refugee caps, others highlight that the pandemic caused the largest single-year fall in 2020 [3] [4].
1. What the official counts actually record — the plain numbers that matter
U.S. Department of Homeland Security annual flow reports and consolidated tables record 1,183,510 persons obtaining lawful permanent resident status in FY2016, 1,127,170 in FY2017, 1,096,610 in FY2018, 1,031,770 in FY2019, and 707,360 in FY2020, showing a clear downward trend over the Trump presidency that culminated in a marked drop in 2020 [1] [2]. These figures count new green-card recipients across categories — family-based, employment-based, humanitarian (refugee/asylee adjustments), and those who adjusted status while already in the U.S. The data show the majority of 2020 LPR grants (62%) were to people already present in the U.S. when they became permanent residents, underscoring that administrative processing and policy choices shaped who became legal permanent residents as much as border-entry flows did [2].
2. Why the decline accelerated in 2020 — pandemic versus policy
Analysts and contemporaneous reporting attribute the largest single-year decline in 2020 to the COVID-19 pandemic, which disrupted visa processing abroad, curtailed travel, and prompted emergency public-health and immigration-related restrictions, but they also note significant preexisting policy shifts under the Trump administration that reduced avenues for permanent immigration, notably limits on refugee admissions and changes to visa procedures [3] [4]. One view emphasizes Covid’s outsized operational effect on admissions; another highlights policy choices across 2017–2019 that steadily reduced permanent visas and tightened asylum and refugee pathways, so the 2020 collapse represents the intersection of policy and a global health crisis [3] [4].
3. What different analysts emphasize — competing narratives about the “Trump effect”
Some analysts argue that legal immigration levels did not collapse across every category during 2016–2020 and that the foreign-born population rose modestly, pointing out that temporary worker programs and international students continued to contribute to the foreign-born population until the pandemic hit, and that refugee admissions were the most sharply curtailed category [3] [4]. Others stress that administrative changes and rhetoric under President Trump produced lasting constriction of humanitarian and permanent pathways, creating a policy environment that discouraged or blocked many prospective migrants even before pandemic travel restrictions took hold [4] [5]. These competing emphases reflect different measures of “immigration” — flows of new green-card holders versus broader foreign-born population counts and temporary admissions.
4. What the official reports omit or complicate — counting nuances and hidden trends
The published LPR totals do not map perfectly to net migration or to unauthorized entries; they record legal permanent resident grants and therefore exclude many temporary arrivals, overstays, and unauthorized crossings that did not result in LPR status. The DHS flow reports also show that a large share of LPRs in 2020 were people already in the U.S. adjusting status, which complicates simple attributions about border enforcement versus bureaucratic backlogs or policy caps [2] [1]. Additionally, Canadian and other international immigration reports cited in background materials are focused on non-U.S. systems and therefore do not inform the count of immigrants entering the United States under the Trump years [6] [7].
5. Reconciling numbers with broader impacts — what’s most important to know
For policymakers and researchers, the key takeaway is that lawful permanent resident admissions declined each year from 2016 through 2020 with the steepest fall in 2020, and that causes are multi-causal: administrative rulemaking and refugee/admissions caps under the Trump administration reduced pathways, while the pandemic produced operational shutdowns and travel restrictions that amplified the decline [1] [3] [4]. Interpreting “how many immigrants entered under President Trump” therefore requires clarifying whether the question targets LPR admissions, temporary visas, refugee admissions, or net migration, because different metrics tell different stories about scale and cause.
6. Final synthesis and guidance for further precision-seeking
If the question aims specifically at lawful permanent residents (green cards), use the DHS annual counts: ~1.18 million in FY2016 down to ~707,362 in FY2020, with each year’s table available in official reports [1] [2]. If the question instead targets total foreign-born population growth, temporary visa holders, asylum seekers, or unauthorized entries, those require different datasets and yield different assessments about Trump-era change; analysts caution against conflating LPR flows with total immigration dynamics [3] [4] [8]. For precision, specify which metric you mean and I will extract and compare the relevant series from the cited reports.