Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: Can immigrants get social security numbers
Executive Summary
Legal immigrants who are lawfully present and authorized to work in the United States can obtain Social Security numbers (SSNs) for employment and benefit-qualification purposes; unauthorized immigrants generally cannot receive SSNs but may appear in tax records using other identifiers. Recent reporting also documents administrative problems that have incorrectly flagged some immigrants in Social Security records, complicating the practical landscape for immigrants and the agency alike [1] [2] [3] [4].
1. What the main claims say — clarity about eligibility and practice
The assembled materials make three central claims: lawfully present, work-authorized noncitizens can get SSNs; SSNs do not equal citizenship; and unauthorized immigrants lack SSN eligibility but may use tax identifiers. Government-facing how-to summaries and policy briefs clearly state that noncitizens in valid immigration status with employment authorization — such as H-1B, L, O, or authorizations tied to students or dependents — are eligible for Social Security numbers and that SSNs are primarily issued for work and benefit access [5] [1] [2]. Reporting also underscores that possessing an SSN is not a substitute for immigration status or citizenship [1].
2. The rules in practice — who typically receives an SSN today
Administrative guidance and recent explainers emphasize that SSNs are issued to noncitizens who are both lawfully present and authorized to work; common eligible groups include many temporary workers, work-authorized students, and lawful permanent residents. These sources stress that the Social Security Administration coordinates with the Department of Homeland Security to verify status before issuing an SSN, and that the number is necessary to accrue Social Security credits and to access certain government programs tied to payroll contributions [5] [2] [1]. Dependents or individuals without work authorization are generally not issued a number.
3. The gap: unauthorized immigrants and alternative tax identifiers
Analyses distinguish between SSNs and tax identifiers, noting that unauthorized immigrants cannot lawfully obtain SSNs but can sometimes participate in the tax system through other means. Some unauthorized workers use an Individual Taxpayer Identification Number (ITIN) or, in certain payroll contexts, an employer identification workaround to file taxes; however, those tax contributions do not automatically translate into eligibility for Social Security benefits without lawful status change, even if they appear in revenue tallies [3]. The materials highlight this as a structural tension between contributions and benefits eligibility.
4. Administrative errors and the human consequences — recent reporting
Investigative reporting shows the Social Security Administration has at times flagged living immigrants as deceased, a designation that can trigger removal processes and disrupt benefits or immigration interactions. Coverage documenting those flags and agency behavior raises concerns about data accuracy and the potential for administrative errors to harm people who are otherwise documented or lawfully present [4] [6] [7]. These pieces report on system-level problems that complicate the straightforward rule that eligible immigrants can obtain SSNs.
5. Diverging emphases across sources — who focuses on what and why
Policy briefs focus on long-term system impacts, arguing legal immigration and work authorization help bolster the payroll base of Social Security even as they underline eligibility rules for SSNs [4] [1]. Technical how-to pieces emphasize procedural eligibility and application mechanics for foreigners seeking SSNs [5] [2]. Investigative journalism scrutinizes administrative missteps and potential misuse of records to prompt departures [4] [7]. The mix of perspectives suggests different agendas: policy reformers highlight fiscal benefits; service guides prioritize access; reporters highlight accountability.
6. Timeline and recency — what changed and when the records were written
Most procedural and explanatory sources are recent or updated within the last two decades, with core procedural descriptions dating from 2003 through mid-2025, and clear reaffirmation in May–June 2025 explainers that noncitizen SSN eligibility is tied to lawful presence and work authorization [5] [1] [2]. Investigative accounts documenting error-prone SSA practices were published or referenced in late 2025, signaling a contemporaneous administrative concern that overlays the longstanding eligibility framework [4] [6] [7]. A 2026 analysis further outlines implications of unauthorized contributions versus benefit access [3].
7. Practical takeaway for immigrants — steps and limits
For immigrants seeking an SSN, the practical route is to secure lawful presence with explicit work authorization and then apply through SSA with DHS verification; applicants should expect the SSN to enable employment, tax reporting, and accrual of Social Security credits but not to confer immigration status or citizenship [1] [2]. Unauthorized immigrants should be aware that ITINs or other tax mechanisms may allow tax compliance but do not create Social Security benefit eligibility, and they may face additional risk from data errors in agency systems [3] [4].
8. Policy implications and missing conversations — what’s often left out
The assembled sources suggest debate remains about how immigrant labor affects Social Security solvency versus the integrity of benefits eligibility, yet reporting on administrative errors reveals a separate governance problem: accurate recordkeeping. Analysts highlighting fiscal contributions advocate clearer pathways to harness immigrant employment for system stability, while journalists urge fixes to avoid wrongful flags that can endanger lives [4]. The conversation needs both clearer policy design and improved data stewardship to align contributions, benefits, and immigration reality.