Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500

Fact check: What is the total annual budget of Indivisible?

Checked on October 18, 2025

Executive Summary

The available materials indicate that Indivisible’s 2023 operations involved approximately $14.06 million in contributions and $15.35 million in expenses, figures presented repeatedly across the summarized documents; no single line explicitly labeled “total annual budget” appears in the provided analyses [1]. The reports also document targeted allocations — roughly $452,000 delivered directly to local groups and about $820,000 invested in tools and infrastructure — which underscore how the organization directed resources even though the materials stop short of framing a single consolidated “budget” figure [2].

1. What the supplied documents actually claim about size and scale

The three parallel analyses consistently report total contributions of $14,062,076 and total expenses of $15,348,480 for 2023, meaning the organization recorded receipts and outlays in that range during the year covered [1]. Each analysis repeats the same numbers and timestamp (June 1, 2026), indicating the financial summary was compiled and published at that date; the repetition strengthens internal consistency but is not independent corroboration. The materials do not present a single line labeled “annual budget,” so readers must infer whether the combination of contributions and expenses constitutes the organization’s practical annual budgetary activity [1].

2. What the reports say about how money was used — concrete allocations that matter

Beyond totals, the analyses cite specific programmatic and support investments: over $452,000 was routed as direct financial support to local Indivisible groups, while $820,000 was invested in tools and infrastructure intended to scale operations and help local chapters [2]. These dollars represent explicit spending priorities and show the organization balanced grants to grassroots groups with internal capacity building. The presence of such line items clarifies the composition of the expense total and illustrates how a non-profit allocates funds across external grants and proprietary infrastructure [2].

3. Why “total annual budget” can be ambiguous and how the documents treat it

Nonprofit reporting commonly distinguishes between revenues, expenses, and an internally adopted budget, and the supplied analyses show reported revenues and expenses rather than an adopted annual budget figure. The absence of a stated “budget” suggests the documents were framed as financial results or an annual financial report rather than a budget proposal or board-approved budget plan. Therefore, using contributions and expenses as proxies for annual budgetary scale is defensible but should be labeled an inference rather than a formal budget statement, because the analyses do not quote a board-approved budget document or budget line [1].

4. Consistency across the supplied sources — strengths and blind spots

All three supplied summaries present the same core numbers and the same publishing date, which creates consistency and reduces the risk of transcription error within this dataset [1]. However, the uniformity also reveals a lack of source diversity in the provided analyses: each appears to draw from the same original reporting package or internal release rather than independent audits, IRS filings, or third-party analyses. This means confirmation bias is a risk: the numbers are coherent but not triangulated beyond the originating materials [1] [2] [3].

5. Missing context that would change interpretation of those numbers

The provided data omit several items that would clarify whether the reported contributions and expenses equal a formal “budget”: there is no mention of beginning or ending net assets, restricted vs. unrestricted contributions, multi-year grants, cash vs. accrual accounting, or an approved board budget for 2023. These omissions matter because multi-year pledges or restricted funds can inflate revenue in a fiscal year without being fully spendable as budgetary resources, while one-time capital expenses can spike expenses without representing recurring budget needs [1] [2] [3].

6. How to state the bottom line responsibly from the provided materials

Based solely on the supplied analyses, the most defensible statement is that Indivisible’s 2023 financial activity consisted of roughly $14.06 million in contributions and $15.35 million in expenses, with notable allocations such as $452,000 to local groups and $820,000 for tools and infrastructure; the documents do not explicitly call any of these figures the organization’s formal “total annual budget” [1] [2] [3]. Readers seeking a formal budget number should request a board-approved budget document, the organization’s IRS Form 990, or audited financial statements to confirm treatment of restricted funds, multi-year commitments, and net assets, none of which are supplied in the provided analyses [1].

Want to dive deeper?
How does Indivisible allocate its annual budget across different programs?
What are the primary sources of funding for Indivisible?
Is Indivisible a 501(c)(4) organization and what are the implications for its budget?
How does Indivisible's budget compare to other progressive advocacy groups?
What is the salary range for Indivisible staff members and how does it impact the overall budget?