Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500

Fact check: What are indivisible's core tenets?

Checked on June 14, 2025

1. Summary of the results

Indivisible's core tenets can be clearly identified from multiple sources, focusing on several key areas:

  • Democracy and Resistance: The organization is fundamentally focused on "saving democracy" and defeating what they term as the MAGA movement [1]. This includes resisting right-wing political agendas [2].
  • Grassroots Organization: They emphasize building collective power through local activism and grassroots organizing [2], with a structure that includes local progressive groups across all states [1].
  • Systemic Change: The organization fights against what they describe as a "rigged democratic system" that favors white and wealthy individuals [1], while promoting a multiracial, inclusive democratic vision [2].
  • Electoral Strategy: They employ an "inside/outside strategy" of advocacy and electoral engagement [2], including electing progressive leaders and supporting Democratic politicians and policies [1].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

Several important contextual elements should be noted:

  • Historical Context: The organization was specifically founded in response to Donald Trump's election in 2016 [1], which provides crucial context for understanding their mission and approach.
  • Operational Structure: The movement operates through coordinated national campaigns while maintaining local group autonomy [2], showing a balance between centralized strategy and local control.
  • Broader Issues: The organization views their mission as addressing interconnected challenges including wealth inequality, racial injustice, and climate crisis [1], suggesting a more comprehensive approach than purely political resistance.

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question was neutral, but understanding potential biases in the responses is important:

  • Political Alignment: The organization explicitly aligns with progressive and Democratic causes [1] [2], which means their stated tenets should be understood within this political context.
  • Framing: The use of terms like "saving democracy" and "rigged democratic system" [1] represents a specific political perspective and framing of issues that may not be universally accepted.
  • Beneficiaries: Progressive politicians and Democratic causes benefit from Indivisible's work and framing of issues [3], while the organization positions itself in direct opposition to conservative and MAGA-aligned interests [1].
Want to dive deeper?
What is the history and founding of the Indivisible movement?
How does Indivisible organize local grassroots political action?
What specific policy positions does Indivisible advocate for?
Who are the key leaders and funders behind Indivisible?
How effective has Indivisible been in influencing elections and legislation?