How much funding has Indivisible received from dark-money groups, nonprofits, or political action committees?
Executive summary
Public records and the tracking site OpenSecrets show that Indivisible operates multiple entities that receive money from other organizations — a 501(c) (Indivisible Project) and at least one PAC (Indivisible Action) — and OpenSecrets provides donor listings for those committees and their outside spending in 2022 and 2024, but the specific aggregate dollar amount of “dark‑money” or nonprofit/PAC funding to Indivisible cannot be stated from the provided reporting alone because the cited pages list donors and detail but do not supply a consolidated total in these excerpts [1] [2] [3] [4]. The legal structure matters: Indivisible’s 501(c) can accept large, less‑transparent donations while the PAC must report itemized contributions [5] [6].
1. Why the question of “how much” is legally and technically complicated
The term “dark money” is itself a legal and definitional hotspot: groups other than traditional PACs — including many nonprofits — may accept unlimited sums and engage in political activity without disclosing all funders, so money routed through 501(c)s or similar vehicles can be effectively opaque; OpenSecrets explains those mechanics and the limits of disclosure that produce “dark money” dynamics [6] [7]. Indivisible’s mix of entities matters because a 501(c) like Indivisible Project can accept larger, less‑traceable grants, whereas Indivisible Action, as a PAC, must disclose contributions to the FEC, so aggregating “dark” versus disclosed money requires parsing multiple filings and donor types [5] [8] [9].
2. What the available reporting shows about donors and disclosure
OpenSecrets maintains separate donor and outside‑spending pages for Indivisible Project and Indivisible Action for 2022 and 2024 that list contributing organizations and donors; those pages are the primary public trail for organizations giving to Indivisible entities and for outside spending activity tied to them [1] [2] [3] [4]. The excerpts provided here do not include line‑by‑line dollar totals or a single summed figure; instead they point to donor detail tabs and committee summaries that must be queried directly on OpenSecrets to produce a precise number [1] [8].
3. How Indivisible frames its own funding and mission; why that matters
Indivisible’s public materials set out a three‑entity structure — a (c) advocacy arm (Indivisible Project), a PAC (Indivisible Action), and a (c) civic education arm (Indivisible Civics) — and explain that donations to the PACs are reportable while the (c) supports legislative advocacy that can accept different kinds of funding [5]. Indivisible also advocates for policies to limit dark money and strengthen disclosure, which creates a rhetorical contrast between its stated goals and the reality that its (c) legal status allows less transparent giving — an implicit tension documented in the organization’s own materials [10] [5].
4. What is known, what is not, and how to get a precise number
From the materials provided, the known facts are that OpenSecrets catalogs donors and outside spending for Indivisible’s PACs and (c) in 2022 and 2024 and that the legal framework enables some nonprofit funding to be less visible [1] [2] [6]. What is not available in these snippets is a single aggregated dollar figure labeling which portion of Indivisible’s receipts specifically qualify as “dark money” or come from nonprofits or PACs; deriving that number requires pulling the detailed donor tables and FEC/IRS filings on OpenSecrets and related public records [3] [8]. For readers seeking the exact dollars, the primary next step is a targeted query of the OpenSecrets donor tabs and the FEC/IRS filings referenced on those pages [1] [8].
5. Context and caveats — broader trends that matter to interpretation
The broader reporting landscape shows rising flows of undisclosed outside spending into political cycles, reinforcing why classification and disclosure matter when assessing Indivisible’s funding: industry‑wide dark‑money activity increased in recent cycles, making it harder to attribute political influence unless researchers compile multiple public records [11] [6]. Independent reporting such as CNN’s investigation into large nonprofit donors to pro‑party super PACs illustrates how sizable grants can be routed through lesser‑known nonprofits, but that specific dynamic is not documented in the provided excerpts as directly tied to Indivisible [12].