Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: What are the primary sources of funding for Indivisible?
Executive Summary
Indivisible’s funding picture differs by entity: public summaries and financial reports indicate money comes from a mix of foundations, major gifts, small-dollar donors, and affiliated PACs, while separate reports assert substantial grants from the Open Society network and claim PAC/individual dominance in specific accounts. Available documents and secondary reporting show overlapping but inconsistent totals and source shares across Indivisible Project, Indivisible Civics, and Indivisible Action, requiring entity-level reconciliation to state precisely where most funds originate [1] [2] [3] [4].
1. What the original claims say — extracting the concrete assertions
The presented analyses assert three central claims: that Indivisible receives grants from Open Society Foundations/Action Fund (noted as roughly $7.61 million and a two-year $3 million award), that Indivisible’s fundraising mix in 2023 included foundations (41%), major gifts (32%), and small-dollar donors (23%) totaling $14,062,076, and that another profile lists PACs as providing 99.93% of funding versus 0.07% from individuals for a particular Indivisible entity. These claims reference distinct documents and profiles that appear to address different Indivisible organizations or accounts [2] [1] [3].
2. What Indivisible’s own materials and directories report
Indivisible’s public pages link to donation portals for multiple legal entities — Indivisible Civics, Indivisible Project, and Indivisible Action — indicating that supporters can give to separate arms with different tax statuses and activities. Organizational directories note Indivisible Project operates as a 501(c)[5] focused on coordinated campaigns and advocacy, but the directory summary does not itself provide a consolidated funding breakdown; it offers search tools to locate grant and donor information for each entity [4] [6]. This structure means funding sources naturally vary by legal vehicle and purpose.
3. Financial breakdowns reported for 2023 — foundations and gifts prominent
A financial summary attributed to 2023 fundraising lists combined contributions across Indivisible entities totaling roughly $14.06 million, with foundations (41%) and major gifts (32%) as the largest shares, followed by small-dollar donations (23%) and distributed fundraising at 3%. Separate lines report Indivisible Civics raising $4.9 million and Indivisible Project approximately $6.5 million in 2023, implying consolidated totals derive from summing distinct entity reports rather than a single pooled account [1].
4. The conflicting profile that emphasizes PAC dominance
One profile claims an unusual funding concentration: 99.93% from PACs and only 0.07% from individuals. That figure appears to describe a specific account or PAC-related vehicle rather than the broader Indivisible network; it lacks accompanying context tying it to the consolidated financials above. Such a stark PAC share is plausible for a political action committee or a particular reporting period but does not align with the foundation-and-donor-driven totals presented in the 2023 breakdown, indicating divergent scopes or reporting frameworks [3].
5. Grants from the Open Society network — documented but context-dependent
Reporting cites that George Soros’s Open Society Foundations and its action arm provided grants to Indivisible totaling about $7.61 million, with a two-year $3 million grant noted for social welfare activities. These grants are recorded in philanthropic reporting and investigative coverage, demonstrating material foundation support to at least some Indivisible entities. However, foundation grants typically flow to specific projects or 501(c)[7]/(c)[5] arms and must be reconciled with year-by-year financial statements to determine how large a share they represent of total revenue [2] [8].
6. Reconciling dates, entities, and reporting standards explains apparent contradictions
The disparate figures arise from different publication dates, targets (individual Indivisible entities versus consolidated network totals), and accounting categories (grants versus PAC receipts versus small-dollar donations). For example, foundation grants recorded across multiple years can sum to millions without contradicting a PAC-dominant report that covers a specific PAC’s receipts. To resolve these contradictions, one must map each reported figure to the named legal entity, fiscal year, and IRS or FEC filing type; without that mapping, comparisons conflate fundamentally different datasets [1] [3] [2].
7. What’s missing and why precision requires primary filings
Public summaries and press reports provide useful signals but omit granular donor lists, audited financial statements for each legal entity, and the specific IRS Form 990 or FEC disclosures tying dollars to donor types. Accurate attribution of “primary sources” demands examining each Indivisible entity’s 990s and FEC filings by year, cross-referencing foundation grant databases for multi-year awards. Absent that reconciliation, statements about singular dominant sources—whether Open Society grants or PAC contributions—risk overstating the case [6] [1].
8. Bottom line for readers seeking a clear answer today
The best-supported synthesis is that Indivisible’s funding is plural and entity-specific: foundations and major donors supply substantial revenue to certain arms, small-dollar donors contribute meaningfully, and PACs fund political-action vehicles; Open Society grants are a documented component. To determine which source is truly “primary” requires reviewing the latest entity-level 990 and FEC filings for the specific Indivisible organization of interest; the provided materials point to those filings but do not by themselves produce a single definitive allocation [1] [2] [3] [4].