Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
What is the relationship between Indivisible and other prominent social justice organizations?
Executive summary
Indivisible is a nationwide, grassroots network of local chapters that organizes around progressive goals—strengthening democracy, reproductive rights, economic and climate justice—and routinely partners with other advocacy groups on campaigns and events [1] [2]. Reporting and organizational materials show formal partnerships at the local level (e.g., with Democratic women’s groups, SWING LEFT, and other progressive organizations) and list several allied organizations including the ACLU, MoveOn, Planned Parenthood, the Working Families Party, and DSA, though descriptions and emphasis vary across chapters and watchdog profiles [3] [4] [5].
1. Indivisible as a decentralized hub that builds local coalitions
Indivisible presents itself as a federated movement: thousands of local groups organize actions, trainings and campaigns while coordinating around a national resource hub and playbook; local chapters explicitly “engage partners” and “lean on sister organizations” to broaden reach and capacity [1] [3]. Local sites such as Indivisible Santa Barbara and Charlotte describe partnering with nearby civic groups and party-affiliated volunteers to run canvasses, marches, and voter-training events [3] [6].
2. Tactical partnerships: campaign work, trainings and joint events
Indivisible chapters routinely co-host practical voter and canvassing work with other progressive groups. For example, Indivisible Oregon partnered with SWING LEFT on “Deep Canvassing” trainings and subsequent canvass events, showing how chapters combine resources and expertise for electoral and organizing goals [4]. National Indivisible materials also advertise training caucuses and resource libraries aimed at coalition-building [7] [8].
3. Named allies and the broader progressive ecosystem
InfluenceWatch’s profile lists prominent civil‑liberties and progressive organizations—Democratic Socialists of America, ACLU, MoveOn.org, Planned Parenthood, Working Families Party and the Tides Foundation—among Indivisible’s most visible allies, placing Indivisible within a constellation of progressive advocacy groups that often coordinate issue-specific pressure campaigns [5]. Local chapters’ event pages further show collaboration with groups focused on labor, climate and racial justice [9] [10].
4. Shared agendas and issue alignment, not uniform strategy
Across pages, Indivisible groups emphasize a consistent set of progressive priorities—democracy defense, healthcare, climate and racial justice—so partnerships are usually issue-aligned rather than standardized: chapters pick partners that advance local campaign priorities [2] [11]. National guidance on building “inclusive partnerships” suggests Indivisible advocates long-term relationship-building, not one-off tactical alliances [8].
5. Financial and reputational links referenced in reporting
A Wikipedia summary and watchdog reporting note past donations and funding connections affecting Indivisible’s national profile; for instance, past reporting cited donations from high-profile funders and ties to philanthropic networks, and InfluenceWatch references Indivisible as a partner in coalitions like Families Over Billionaires [12] [5]. Those accounts place Indivisible in networks that include both grassroots donors and institutional funders, which can shape who it partners with and how critics portray the network [12] [5].
6. Points of tension and differing perspectives inside the Democratic coalition
Not all Democrats view Indivisible the same way: InfluenceWatch cites a June 2025 meeting where some moderate Democrats criticized Indivisible and similar advocacy groups for pushing positions they saw as politically risky, illustrating intra‑party disagreement about tactics and policy priorities [5]. That complaint suggests partnerships with more activist or left-leaning groups can be a source of friction inside broader coalitions [5].
7. Limitations of available reporting and what’s not found
Available sources document many local partnerships and list prominent allied organizations, but they do not provide a comprehensive, authoritative roster of formal national partnerships nor detailed contractual relationships between Indivisible’s national body and every named ally; available sources do not mention full financial terms or legal partnership agreements for each collaboration [1] [5]. They also do not uniformly describe how national and chapter-level coordination is governed across the movement [3] [7].
8. Bottom line for readers evaluating relationships
Indivisible operates as a decentralized movement that forms pragmatic, issue-focused alliances with other progressive organizations at local and national levels; watchdog and local reporting place it inside a broader progressive ecosystem that includes civil‑liberties groups, electoral organizers, and advocacy funders, while critics within the Democratic Party sometimes fault its tactics [1] [5]. For specifics about a particular chapter’s partners or a named national partnership, consult that chapter’s event pages or Indivisible’s resource listings, since chapter-level disclosures are where most partnerships are documented [3] [8].