Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500

Fact check: What is the Insurrection Act and how does it relate to National Guard deployment?

Checked on June 9, 2025

1. Summary of the results

The Insurrection Act of 1807 is a federal law that grants the president extraordinary powers to deploy U.S. military forces and federalize National Guard units domestically [1]. It serves as a notable exception to the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, which generally prohibits the military from acting as a domestic law enforcement body [2]. The Act is codified in Sections 251-255 of Title 10 of the U.S. Code [3].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

Several crucial aspects were not addressed in the original question:

  • Specific Deployment Triggers: The president can deploy forces under three distinct scenarios [4]:
  • Section 251: With state request
  • Section 252: At president's discretion to enforce laws
  • Section 253: To suppress insurrection or protect constitutional rights
  • Historical Context: The Act has been used sparingly throughout history, with notable applications during:
  • The Civil War under President Lincoln
  • Against the Ku Klux Klan under President Grant
  • During the 1992 Rodney King riots under President Bush [5]
  • Important Distinctions: While allowing military deployment, the Act does not suspend civil liberties or replace civilian government, making it distinct from martial law [5]

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

Several concerning aspects need to be highlighted:

  • Legal Concerns: Legal experts across the political spectrum have raised concerns about the Act's vague language, which could enable presidential abuse of power [4]
  • Current Political Context: The Trump administration has considered invoking the Act for border security purposes, which critics argue could represent a dangerous expansion of executive power [6]
  • Reform Needs: The law is widely considered "dangerously vague and in urgent need of reform" [3], suggesting potential risks in its current form

Those who benefit from broad interpretations of the Act include:

  • Executive branch officials seeking expanded powers
  • Law enforcement agencies wanting military support
  • Political figures looking to demonstrate "tough" responses to civil unrest

Those advocating for reform include:

  • Civil rights organizations
  • Legal scholars
  • State governments wanting to maintain autonomy
Want to dive deeper?
What are the historical precedents for invoking the Insurrection Act in the United States?
How does the Posse Comitatus Act limit military involvement in domestic law enforcement?
What is the difference between federalizing National Guard and invoking the Insurrection Act?
What constitutional powers does the president have to deploy military forces domestically?
How have different presidents used the Insurrection Act throughout American history?