Intelligence community stetement about threat for Candice owns from franch legion
Executive summary
Candace Owens has publicly accused French President Emmanuel Macron and First Lady Brigitte Macron of authorizing an assassination plot against her and said a French government insider told her Charlie Kirk’s alleged killer trained with the French Foreign Legion’s 13th Brigade; multiple outlets reported her claims but none of the provided sources show independent verification or official confirmation of those allegations [1] [2]. Reporting records that Owens says she has “proof” from a contact and that she informed U.S. authorities, while French, Israeli and U.S. officials have not provided confirming statements in the articles available [1] [3] [4].
1. What Owens is alleging — the claims in brief
Candace Owens posted on X that a “high‑ranking employee of the French Government” told her Emmanuel and Brigitte Macron paid for an assassination squad that included French operatives and “one Israeli,” that payments ran through the Club des Cent, and that Charlie Kirk’s alleged killer trained with the French Foreign Legion’s 13th Brigade — claims she described as “deadly serious” and said she has “concrete proof” of the informant’s position [5] [1] [6].
2. What multiple outlets report — broad coverage, similar wording
A range of outlets — from TheWrap and International Business Times to Times of India, The Jerusalem Post and other sites — published stories repeating Owens’s account and direct social‑media posts; those pieces document her statements tying the alleged plot to Kirk’s September death and to journalist Xavier Poussard’s safety, and note she has informed federal authorities or said she would [1] [2] [3] [7].
3. Verification and official responses — what the available reporting shows
None of the provided articles contain independent verification of Owens’s central allegations: the French government, Israeli authorities, or U.S. officials are not shown as confirming the plot or the training claim in these reports; several outlets explicitly note there was no immediate official response to requests for comment [1] [4] [8]. The Jerusalem Post story points out that “no evidence or official confirmation has been provided” in coverage of the accusation [8].
4. Specifics about the French Foreign Legion and GIGN assertions
Owens’s posts reference the “French legion 13th brigade” as the unit that trained the alleged assassin; reporting often conflates or links that claim to elite French units such as the French Foreign Legion’s 13th Demi‑Brigade or the GIGN in its descriptions, but the articles do not include documentary proof of training ties or official personnel records to support that specific allegation [2] [5] [7].
5. Context: legal fight and prior disputes with the Macrons
Multiple reports situate these claims in a wider, ongoing feud: the Macrons filed a 22‑count/219‑page defamation lawsuit in Delaware earlier in 2025 over previous allegations from Owens, and these assassination claims followed that litigation and months of public conflict — a context that outlets emphasize as relevant background [9] [10].
6. How outlets characterize credibility and public reaction
Some outlets characterize the story as explosive or “deadly serious” because of Owens’s prominence and her assertion of corroborating proof; other coverage notes the risk that such claims can fuel conspiracy narratives absent corroboration, and some pieces record large public engagement with her posts [3] [11] [1].
7. Competing viewpoints and limitations in the record
The reporting presents Owens’s version as a serious allegation and documents her statements that she’s contacted authorities; countervailing material is limited in the available sources — there is no published material here confirming the informant’s identity, the alleged financial trail, the presence of Israeli operatives, or any official French admission. Therefore, available sources do not mention independent verification of the key claims and do not record an authoritative refutation by French officials [1] [8].
8. What a reader should watch for next
Given the lack of corroboration in the cited articles, watchers should look for (a) official statements from French, Israeli or U.S. authorities; (b) documentary evidence of the alleged Club des Cent financial trail; and (c) any law‑enforcement filings or reporting that substantiate training links between the named suspect and French units — none of which appear in the current reporting [1] [6].
Final note: the materials provided show broad media pickup of Owens’s claims and the legal context with the Macrons, but they do not establish those claims as proven; journalists and officials quoted in the available coverage either repeat Owens’s account or note a lack of confirmation [2] [8].