Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500

Fact check: Iraq fucked up by bombing the US embassy!!!

Checked on June 21, 2025

1. Summary of the results

The analyses from multiple sources definitively contradict the claim that Iraq bombed the US embassy. The evidence shows that attacks on the US Embassy in Baghdad were carried out by Iran-backed militias, not the Iraqi government itself [1] [2] [3].

Specifically, the sources indicate that:

  • Iraqi supporters of an Iran-backed militia were responsible for the embassy attack, not Iraq as a state [1]
  • Iran-backed militias conducted rocket attacks on the US Embassy in Baghdad and vowed more attacks [2] [3]
  • Recent developments show the US preparing partial evacuation of embassy personnel due to regional security concerns, but this is part of broader Middle East tensions rather than Iraqi government actions [4]

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The original statement omits several crucial pieces of context:

  • Iraq as a government has denied security concerns behind US Embassy personnel movements, suggesting the Iraqi state is not the aggressor [5]
  • Iraq is actively trying to balance its relations with both the US and Iran, taking a "multi-aligned approach" rather than acting as an enemy to the US [6]
  • The country is working on developing its own security capabilities and managing the presence of foreign troops, indicating cooperation rather than hostility with US forces [7]
  • Iran-backed militias operate independently of the Iraqi government and often act against Iraqi state interests

Those who benefit from conflating Iraqi government actions with militia attacks include:

  • Iranian leadership - deflects blame from their proxy militias onto Iraq
  • US defense contractors and military officials - justifies continued military presence and spending in the region
  • Political figures seeking to simplify complex Middle East dynamics for domestic audiences

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement contains significant factual inaccuracies and demonstrates clear bias:

  • False attribution: The statement incorrectly blames the Iraqi government for actions carried out by Iran-backed militias [1] [2] [3]
  • Inflammatory language: The use of "fucked up" suggests emotional bias rather than factual analysis
  • Oversimplification: Ignores the complex relationship between Iraq, Iran-backed militias, and the US government
  • Lack of temporal context: Fails to distinguish between different incidents and timeframes, mixing historical attacks with recent diplomatic movements

This type of misinformation benefits those who want to justify aggressive policies toward Iraq or who seek to obscure Iran's role in regional destabilization by shifting blame to the Iraqi government.

Want to dive deeper?
What were the circumstances surrounding the US embassy bombing in Iraq?
How has the US responded to attacks on its embassy in Iraq?
What are the current security protocols for the US embassy in Baghdad?
Have there been any recent developments in US-Iraq relations following the bombing?
What role did Iran play in the US embassy bombing in Iraq?