Is D66 een rechtse partij?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
D66 is not a right-wing party in conventional terms; it is repeatedly described in party literature and independent reporting as a social-liberal, progressive formation positioned from the centre to the centre-left of Dutch politics [1] [2]. That said, D66 is pragmatic and has shifted some stances (notably on migration), which can make it appear to the right on specific issues even while its core identity remains liberal-progressive [3] [4].
1. Identity and declared ideology
D66’s own materials and encyclopedic summaries characterise it as social-liberal and progressive, rooted in a post‑1966 project of democratic reform and a blend of liberal and social‑democratic inspirations — “liberty against equality” framed as a false dichotomy by founders — which places the party on the centre to centre‑left of the political spectrum [1] [5] [2].
2. Policy mix: why “not right” on core issues
On core areas like education, climate, equality and civil liberties D66 advances policies typically associated with progressive parties — prioritising accessible, high‑quality education, ambitious climate action and equal opportunities — language found consistently in municipal and national D66 manifestos and descriptions [6] [2]; these commitments underpin why most observers classify the party as centrist or centre‑left rather than right‑wing [1] [7].
3. Market, Europe and pragmatic liberalism — shades that can look centrist
D66’s liberal strand emphasizes individual freedom, pro‑European integration and pragmatic governance, advocating sustainable growth and deeper European cooperation — positions aligned with liberal international groupings (ALDE/Liberal International) and with elements of market‑friendly policy that place it in the liberal centre rather than on a conservative right [8] [5].
4. Electoral strategy and coalition behavior that complicate labels
In practice D66 has governed with centre‑right partners and appealed to affluent, urban, university‑educated voters, and its pragmatism has sometimes produced policies or coalition compromises that look more centrist than leftist; recent electoral performance and coalition maneuvering have reinforced its image as a bridge party between progressive and liberal‑conservative camps [1] [9] [7].
5. Why some actors call D66 “right” — and what that claim hides
Accusations that D66 is “right‑wing” typically latch onto market‑oriented rhetoric, tougher migration proposals or coalition choices rather than the party’s declared social‑liberal identity; for example, D66 under Rob Jetten hardened some migration positions during recent campaigns, a tactical shift observers highlighted even while calling the party centrist‑liberal overall [3] [4]. Those pushing a “right” label often have partisan motives: opponents on the left want to reclaim votes, and right‑wing critics seek to blur distinctions with conservative rivals — the sources note both substantive policy change and political positioning as explanations [4] [3].
6. The contested nature of D66’s ideological self‑image
Scholars and journalists note that D66’s ideology is internally contested and historically eclectic — a program‑based, pragmatic party that draws on liberal and social democratic currents — which means its precise place on left‑right maps is disputed even within the party and among analysts [1] [5] [10]. Reporting shows the party can attract voters from both directions and that its labels shift depending on the issue debated [4].
Bottom line
Public records, party materials and mainstream reporting converge on this: D66 is a social‑liberal, progressive party positioned from the centre to the centre‑left, not a right‑wing party; tactical shifts on issues like migration and coalition choices explain why some observers portray it as more centrist or even right‑leaning on particular questions, but those episodic positions do not replace its core liberal‑progressive identity [1] [2] [3].