Is Donald Trump a sexual predator

Checked on January 12, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

A substantial body of reporting and legal findings shows dozens of women have accused Donald Trump of sexual harassment, assault, and other misconduct over several decades, and a civil jury found him liable for sexually abusing writer E. Jean Carroll — a judgment later upheld by an appeals court — while Trump has consistently denied wrongdoing and characterized allegations as politically motivated [1] [2] [3]. Whether one labels him a “sexual predator” depends on how that term is defined: the public record contains numerous accusations and at least one civil finding of sexual abuse, but no criminal conviction for sexual crimes appears in the provided sources [1] [2] [4].

1. The scale and pattern of allegations: dozens of accusers over decades

Reporting aggregated by outlets and long-form accounts documents that roughly two dozen to more than 40 women have publicly accused Trump of unwanted sexual behavior ranging from non-consensual kissing and groping to rape allegations dating back to the 1970s through the 2000s, a pattern catalogued by multiple news organizations and compilations [1] [5] [6] [4] [7].

2. The strongest legal outcome: the Carroll civil verdict and appeals rulings

E. Jean Carroll’s lawsuits resulted in a Manhattan jury finding Trump liable for sexually abusing her and awarding substantial damages, a verdict that news organizations reported and a federal appeals court later upheld — an outcome the sources identify as the most significant and legally validated allegation against him in the civil system [2] [3] [8].

3. Criminal charges vs. civil findings: limits of the record provided

The sources emphasize that, although many women have accused Trump, the public record in these documents shows civil litigation and settlements, not a criminal conviction for sexual assault; reporting repeatedly notes Trump has never been criminally charged for sexual misconduct in the cases summarized here, and that some lawsuits were dismissed or withdrawn [4] [8] [9].

4. Evidence, corroboration, and legal strategy: how credibility was assessed

Coverage of the Carroll trial and related reporting shows jurors considered testimony from multiple women, contemporaneous statements, the Access Hollywood tape, and other corroborative material as part of reaching a verdict, and legal analysts and advocates have pointed to pattern evidence and testimony as critical to the civil finding [10] [2] [11].

5. Denials, political framing, and competing narratives

Trump and his spokespeople have uniformly denied the allegations, called them politically motivated, and in public statements and campaign appearances have sought to discredit accusers and news coverage — a response that media critics and supporters argue reflects a broader effort to frame the allegations as partisan attacks, an explanation the sources record alongside the accusations [1] [12] [11].

6. What “sexual predator” means in public discourse and what the record supports

“Sexual predator” is a charged label used in journalism and advocacy to describe repetitive, predatory sexual behavior; the reviewed sources document repeated allegations by many women and at least one civil finding of sexual abuse — evidence that supporters of the label point to — while the absence of a criminal conviction and persistent denials form the countervailing factual limits that journalists and some legal commentators emphasize [6] [2] [4] [9].

7. Conclusion: weighing the evidence in the record provided

Based on the assembled reporting and legal outcomes available here, the factual record demonstrates numerous accusations over decades and a civil jury’s finding that Trump sexually abused E. Jean Carroll — facts that underpin claims that he behaved in a predatory manner — but the sources also document denials by Trump and the lack of criminal convictions in these matters, meaning the determination of the label “sexual predator” combines documented legal findings and contested moral judgments rather than an uncontested criminal verdict in the public record cited [1] [2] [3] [4].

Want to dive deeper?
What legal standards differentiate civil liability from criminal conviction in sexual assault cases involving public figures?
How did the E. Jean Carroll trial use testimony from other accusers and the Access Hollywood tape as corroborating evidence?
How have media outlets catalogued and verified the dozens of sexual misconduct allegations against Donald Trump over time?