Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Is trump good?
Executive Summary
Public assessments of whether Donald Trump is “good” split sharply along partisan lines: recent national polls show more Americans disapprove than approve of his job performance, scholars rank his presidency poorly in historical comparisons, and legal and ethical controversies complicate any simple judgment. Supporters emphasize policy outcomes on the economy and immigration while critics point to perceived abuses of power, legal entanglements, and norm violations; these competing factual bases explain why the question is primarily normative and politically polarized [1] [2] [3] [4].
1. What people actually claim when they ask “Is Trump good?” — Sorting the statements that matter
The simple question “is Trump good?” bundles distinct factual claims that need separation: job performance, respect for norms and law, policy outcomes, and personal character. Polls address job performance and public approval, showing fluctuating approval rates and substantial disapproval in 2025 data; scholarly surveys evaluate historical presidential greatness, placing Trump at the bottom in an expert ranking; and legal reviews document extensive litigation and civil findings that bear on questions of legality and ethics. Distinguishing these strands clarifies that answering “is he good” requires specifying which domain — approval, historical standing, legality, or policy — is under consideration [1] [3] [4].
2. The polling snapshot that captures current public judgment — Americans’ ratings and power concerns
Nationwide polling in late 2024 and across 2025 shows disapproval majorities in multiple surveys, with approval numbers varying but often trailing disapproval; a November 4, 2025 compilation found disapproval in the low 50s to low 60s in several media polls, while some polls recorded higher approval in specific samples. A Pew study in October 2025 found 69% of Americans believe Trump seeks more power than predecessors, with 58% disapproving of his job performance and 40% approving, signaling that concerns about executive overreach are widespread and partisan divisions are stark: Democrats overwhelmingly view his actions as dangerous, while significant Republican cohorts either support or are divided on his approach to power [1] [2].
3. How academics and historians rate him — a stark historical indictment
A 2024 survey of 154 presidential scholars ranked Donald Trump last among U.S. presidents on a 0–100 greatness scale, citing divisiveness, a slim legislative record, and refusal to accept electoral defeat as central factors contributing to his position. The same study noted that contemporary Democratic presidents rose in the rankings while modern Republican presidents declined, implying scholars weigh institutional norms and democratic behavior heavily in historical assessments. While scholarly panels are not the public, their evaluations inform institutional and historical interpretations of presidential performance and signal elite consensus on norms violations [3].
4. Legal and ethical record — an extraordinary volume of litigation and contested findings
Trump’s legal footprint is unusually large for an American political leader: thousands of cases across federal and state courts involve him or his businesses, ranging from business disputes to defamation suits and allegations of sexual misconduct, with at least one civil finding of liability for sexual harassment. Reviews note that his enterprises faced claims of tax and financial misrepresentation, investor suits, and multiple high-profile defamation actions, producing significant financial penalties and reputational consequences for him and his companies. These documented legal controversies feed public concerns about ethics, accountability, and the rule of law and are central to many critics’ claims that he is not “good” in a civic or legal sense [4].
5. Why supporters say he is good — policy wins, identity, and perceived change
Qualitative and survey research from late 2024 shows that Trump supporters emphasize tangible policy areas — the economy, immigration enforcement, judicial appointments — and value his role as a change agent against an entrenched establishment. Studies and voter interviews highlight that many supporters see Trump as defending traditions and national identity, and rank him highly for delivering perceived benefits even when they acknowledge contentious rhetoric or governance style. Political psychology research reports higher scores on threat sensitivity and authoritarian orientations among his voters, which helps explain why policy outcomes and cultural stances translate into positive judgments of his leadership for them [5] [6] [7].
6. Putting the pieces together — the factual bottom line without a normative verdict
Factually, Americans’ aggregate approval tilts negative in multiple polls, scholars rank Trump very low historically, his legal record is extensive and includes adverse findings, and his core supporters cite concrete policy and cultural reasons for support. These documented facts explain why assessments of whether Trump is “good” diverge sharply: public opinion metrics, scholarly judgment, legal findings, and supporter testimony all yield different—yet empirically grounded—answers depending on which metric you prioritize. To move beyond the one-word question, define the criterion (e.g., job performance, legal probity, policy outcomes, democratic norms) and weigh the documented evidence above to reach a reasoned conclusion [1] [2] [3] [4] [5].