Is farage a racist
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Allegations from dozens of former Dulwich College pupils and teachers say Nigel Farage made racist and antisemitic remarks as a teenager; The Guardian reports 28 contemporaries have come forward, and multiple outlets detail claims including chants such as “gas ’em all” and direct taunts to Jewish and Black classmates [1] [2] [3]. Farage and Reform UK deny he was “racist with malice,” calling some accounts misremembered or politically motivated, while critics say the pattern of testimony and party culture merit scrutiny [4] [2] [5].
1. The allegations: many witnesses, specific claims
Journalists have collected accounts from around two dozen to 28 former pupils and at least one former teacher who describe repeated racist and antisemitic behaviour by Farage at Dulwich College in the 1970s — allegations include chanting antisemitic songs, telling Jewish classmates “Hitler was right” or “gas them,” and racially taunting Black and South Asian pupils [1] [2] [3]. Multiple outlets report corroborating testimony: The Guardian says 28 contemporaries have spoken up; ITV and Sky News summarise similar first‑hand claims [1] [6] [7].
2. Farage’s response: denial, minimisation and counter‑accusations
Farage denies ever being racist “with malice” and says he may have been “mischievous” or engaged in “banter” as a teenager, arguing recollections vary and asserting a political element to the resurfacing allegations [4] [8] [9]. His party’s lawyers have “categorically denied” that he engaged in, condoned or led racist or antisemitic behaviour, and deputy leader Richard Tice called the claims “made‑up twaddle” [2] [9].
3. Journalistic corroboration and legal caution
News organisations covering the story note they have interviewed multiple separate witnesses and have had accounts checked by lawyers; The Guardian says each piece of testimony was separately sourced and legally reviewed [2] [1]. At the same time, broadcasters and commentators have highlighted the passage of nearly 50 years and the difficulty of reconstructing events from distant memory — a point raised by Farage and some supporters [10] [4].
4. Political consequences and reactions inside Westminster
The allegations have prompted calls for an apology and political fallout: Conservative figures such as Kemi Badenoch have urged Farage to apologise given the number of witnesses, while Reform’s poll standing and public debate have been affected as the controversy circulates in mainstream outlets [11] [2] [9]. Critics say the claims fit a broader pattern in which Farage has long targeted migrants and minorities in political rhetoric — a link emphasised by outlets like Byline Times [12].
5. Broader context: culture of the era vs sustained behaviour today
Several defenders argue that 1970s private‑school culture was different and that boys “said things they’d regret,” positioning the allegations as products of a changed cultural standard rather than proof of an adult racist [10]. Opponents counter that multiple witness accounts describing repeated, targeted abuse suggest a coherent pattern beyond mere playground roughness, and some point to instances of rhetoric and personnel choices in Reform UK as evidence of an emboldening effect [1] [5] [12].
6. What the sources do and do not establish
Available reporting establishes that dozens of former classmates have independently told journalists of racist and antisemitic conduct by Farage at school, and that Farage and his team deny those claims or characterise them as misremembered or politically motivated [1] [2] [4]. Current reporting does not produce a legal finding or judicial determination of racism; it does not show definitive proof of malicious intent beyond the contemporaries’ testimony, nor do the supplied sources include independent forensic evidence from the time [2] [1].
7. How to judge the question “Is Farage a racist?”
Whether a public figure “is a racist” is a judgement that depends on definitions (individual intent, pattern of behaviour, present actions) and on weighting contemporaneous testimony against denials. The sources present substantial first‑person accusations from Farage’s schooldays and clear denials from him and his legal team; they also show political actors and commentators drawing opposite conclusions [1] [2] [4]. Readers must decide whether the volume and consistency of witness testimony, plus later political conduct flagged by critics, suffice to label him as such — the reporting supplies the evidence but not a legally adjudicated verdict [1] [12] [2].
Limitations: reporting relies chiefly on retrospective witness testimony and media legal checks; no court or independent inquiry outcome is cited in these sources [2]. Competing perspectives exist in the coverage: detailed allegations from multiple witnesses versus Farage’s denial and portrayal of the claims as politicised [1] [4].