Is mark levine more pro American or israel

1. Name confusion matters: three public figures with different orientations

Public reporting lumps together three similarly named figures whose records diverge: Mark Levin, the conservative talk‑show host and author, repeatedly celebrates and defends Israel and links that defense to American values ^{[1] [3] [2]}; Mark Levine, the New York elected official and comptroller, has said Israel bonds are important to municipal portfolios and has deep personal ties to Israel while also saying he holds criticisms of Israel’s government ^{[4] [7]}; and Mark LeVine, the historian and professor, argues for radically different solutions to the Israeli–Palestinian conflict and has been associated with BDS and sharp critiques of Israeli policy ^{[5] [6]}.

2. Mark Levin (conservative commentator): ardently pro‑Israel framed as pro‑America

Mark Levin’s public record shows consistent, unapologetic support for Israel as both a strategic and moral cause, a theme at fundraising events and in his media appearances where he ties American liberty to solidarity with Israel ^{[3] [2]}. He warns that U.S. officials and media hostility threaten Israel and frames criticism of Israel as part of a broader anti‑American cultural struggle ^{[1] [8]}. Organizational praise — for example the Shield of Jerusalem award — and addresses to pro‑Israel audiences underscore that Levin’s stance prioritizes Israel within his vision of American conservatism ^[2].

3. Mark Levine (NYC official): pro‑Israel ties within an official, fiduciary balancing act

New York Comptroller Mark Levine has publicly stated he has “deep personal ties to Israel” and defended the inclusion of Israel‑linked investments, calling Israel bonds a reasonable portfolio choice for the city; at the same time he has said he criticizes the Israeli government as he criticizes his own ^[4]. Critics from the left have assailed those investment decisions as exceptional treatment of Israel and politically consequential ^[7], while pro‑Israel outlets note Levine’s defense of bonds and his comments about Israel’s security. His record reads as pragmatic and dual‑minded: personal affinity and institutional responsibility, rather than an ideological override of U.S. interests ^{[4] [7]}.

4. Mark LeVine (academic): a counterpoint — critical of Israel and supportive of Palestinian remedies

Scholar Mark LeVine’s published positions contrast sharply: he advocates “parallel states” or other transformative arrangements, has written critically about Israel’s occupation, and has been associated with BDS and pointed social‑media denunciations of Israeli policy ^{[5] [6]}. Sources describing his activity paint him as an intellectual and activist whose orientation is not “pro‑Israel” and who frames U.S. policy as enabling Israeli practices he opposes ^{[9] [6]}.

5. Conclusion — answer with nuance, not a binary

Answering whether “Mark Levin(e/LeVine)” is more pro‑American or pro‑Israel requires distinguishing the person: Mark Levin the commentator presents Israel defense as inseparable from his conception of American values and thus is both pro‑Israel and pro‑America in tandem ^{[1] [3]}; Mark Levine the comptroller balances personal pro‑Israel ties with stated fiduciary duties and explicit willingness to criticize Israeli government actions ^{[4] [7]}; Mark LeVine the academic is instead a critic of Israeli policy and advocates alternatives often framed as anti‑status‑quo rather than “pro‑America” in the partisan sense ^{[5] [6]}. Reporting limitations: the available sources document statements and affiliations but do not provide exhaustive, contemporaneous voting records, private communications, or a complete accounting of motivations, so conclusions are bounded to the public record cited above.