Is trump being investigated forar crimes
Executive summary
There is no clear, sourced reporting in the provided documents that the president, Donald Trump, is the subject of a current criminal investigation; the coverage instead documents an aggressive Trump Justice Department that has opened probes into a range of perceived opponents and high-profile figures such as Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell (who has said he is under criminal investigation) — a dynamic that has prompted accusations the DOJ is being used as an instrument of political enforcement [1] [2].
1. What the reporting actually shows about investigations and targets
Recent coverage centers on a Justice Department that has pursued inquiries of people and institutions at odds with the White House, most notably the unprecedented criminal probe into Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, which Powell publicly acknowledged and blamed on political weaponization by the administration [1] [2]; Reuters documents a pattern of prosecutions and probes under this DOJ that include officials who investigated Trump, lawmakers, donors and critics rather than reporting any authoritative source saying Trump himself is the target of a criminal investigation [2].
2. Why Powell’s probe matters to the larger question
The Powell investigation is emblematic: it demonstrates a DOJ willing to subpoena the Federal Reserve and investigate a sitting official closely tied to monetary policy disputes with the White House — an action that commentators have described as eroding long-standing norms meant to separate politics from policing [2]; reporting on the episode makes clear political and market anxieties followed, including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent warning the president the probe “made a mess” for markets, which underscores that the news is about the targets of DOJ scrutiny, not a criminal inquiry into the president himself [3].
3. Claims and denials inside the White House and among allies
The White House has repeatedly denied direct presidential involvement in Justice Department decisions even as critics point to a pattern of targeting perceived enemies, and major outlets record both denials and skepticism: Trump has said he was not involved in the decision to subpoena the Fed, while Reuters and NBC report broader concerns that the administration’s DOJ is acting as a White House enforcer [1] [4] [2].
4. Where the sources are silent — and why that matters
None of the supplied reporting supplies a sourced assertion that Trump is under a criminal investigation; instead the material documents investigations that his administration has initiated or pursued against others and describes political friction around those probes [1] [2]. Because the available reporting does not answer whether any separate federal or state prosecutor has an open criminal probe into the president, it would be outside this record to assert that one exists or to claim definitively that no such inquiry is underway.
5. Political and procedural context that readers should weigh
The administration has simultaneously created new institutional tools — for example, announcing a DOJ “division for national fraud enforcement” to coordinate major fraud probes — which signals policy priorities and an appetite for aggressive investigations tied to the White House’s agenda [5]; watchdogs and opposition groups are compiling legal challenges and tracking lawsuits against the administration, arguing the president’s actions have generated a large body of litigation and scrutiny even if that litigation is civil rather than criminal [6].
6. Two plausible alternative readings from the same facts
One reading, advanced by critics cited in these reports, is that the DOJ under Trump is weaponizing criminal tools to intimidate critics and influence political outcomes — an interpretation buttressed by the breadth of probes documented in Reuters and NBC [4] [2]. An alternative, advanced by administration officials in these sources, is that the DOJ is performing its duty to investigate potential wrongdoing and that denials of presidential interference should be taken at face value pending concrete evidence [1] [4].
Conclusion: how to answer the original question with the available evidence
Based on the provided reporting, the accurate answer is: the Justice Department under President Trump has launched and overseen multiple high-profile investigations of others, including the Fed chair, but the supplied sources do not document an active criminal investigation targeting President Trump himself; the record here documents aggressive use of prosecutorial power and vigorous political debate over it, not a sourced finding that the president is under criminal inquiry [1] [2] [5].