Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

Is trump the worst president

Checked on November 12, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important info or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive Summary

Donald Trump’s place in historical rankings is contested but many academic surveys of presidential historians place him at or near the bottom; public opinion polls and partisan reactions complicate a simple “worst president” label. Historical surveys of historians frequently rank Trump among the lowest presidents, while media and think-tank commentary and public polling show a more mixed and partisan picture [1] [2] [3].

1. Why historians often put Trump at the bottom — a recurring academic verdict

Multiple surveys of professional historians and presidential scholars have repeatedly placed Donald Trump in the lowest tier of presidential rankings. A 2018 survey of presidential historians ranked Trump last in “Presidential Greatness,” noting his high polarization and low scores on traditional leadership criteria; follow-up surveys reported in 2024 and 2025 have again placed him at or near the bottom in similar academic tallies [2] [1] [4]. These academic rankings rely on multi-dimensional criteria — constitutional stewardship, crisis leadership, moral authority and legislative accomplishments — and scholars cite long-term institutional norms and democratic practices when explaining their scores. Academic consensus on Trump’s low standing reflects methodological continuity: expert panels using comparable metrics have produced consistent low scores over multiple rounds, signaling professional judgment rather than a single anomalous poll [5] [1].

2. Public opinion and partisan differences complicate the “worst” label

Public polling shows a different, more nuanced picture: some national polls and think-tank analyses place Trump’s approval and retrospective assessments above several low-ranked presidents in public view, and his post-presidential approval among Republicans remains high, indicating strong partisan cleavages [3]. Public perceptions weigh present political alignment, policy outcomes like taxes or the economy, and media narratives differently than historians do. Partisanship systematically skews popular rankings, so while historians emphasize institutional norms and long-term effects, public assessments focus on immediate policy impacts and identity politics. This divergence explains why academic and public verdicts on “worst” can point in different directions at the same time [3] [6].

3. Rival candidates for “worst” — context from other presidents

Historians and mainstream rankings still frequently single out earlier 19th-century presidents when asked about overall failure. James Buchanan commonly appears in long-standing lists as the worst president for his leadership failures before the Civil War, and several major outlets average multiple polls to place Buchanan ahead of Trump in historic failure metrics [6] [7]. The contrast shows that “worst” is sensitive to which criteria are prioritized: immediate constitutional breaches and norm erosion are weighed heavily by contemporary scholars reviewing Trump, while catastrophic policy consequences and failure to prevent war are focal points in older-era condemnations [7] [6].

4. Recent commentary and polemics — strong claims from multiple sides

Opinion and advocacy organizations have produced starkly divergent narratives: some outlets and watchdogs label Trump “the worst” for alleged attacks on democratic institutions and repeated falsehoods, while conservative commentators and some think tanks emphasize economic indicators and deregulatory achievements to argue for a more positive legacy [8] [9] [3]. These pieces often serve political purposes: critics seek to delegitimize future influence, while supporters seek to bolster continued political relevance. Readers should note agendas: advocacy-driven analyses selectively emphasize particular metrics and events, which explains why sensational claims—both negative and positive—proliferate alongside sober academic surveys [8] [3].

5. Bottom line — a nuanced, evidence-centered conclusion

The available evidence supports two firm facts: historians in multiple formal surveys rank Trump at or near the bottom of presidential greatness, and public and partisan assessments are more mixed and often more favorable, creating a persistent split between academic and popular judgments [1] [4] [3]. Whether Trump is “the worst” depends on the evaluative frame: scholars emphasize institutional norms and long-term democratic health, while public polls and partisans emphasize present policy results and identity alignment. A definitive, cross-cutting consensus that Trump is the single worst president does not exist across all metrics, but the weight of specialist historical surveys places him among the lowest-ranked modern presidents [2] [4] [5].

Want to dive deeper?
Who do historians consider the worst US presidents?
What criteria are used to rank presidential performance?
How does Donald Trump's approval rating compare to other presidents?
What were the major achievements and failures of Trump's presidency 2017-2021?
Has public opinion on Trump's presidency changed since 2021?