Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Are there similar spy network allegations against Israel by other African nations?
Executive Summary
There are multiple, documented allegations that Israeli-origin spyware and intelligence activities have been used across several African countries, with reporting and research naming nations such as Morocco, Togo, Rwanda, Ghana, Botswana, Equatorial Guinea, Kenya, Nigeria, Zambia, Zimbabwe and South Africa as implicated in various ways [1] [2] [3]. The evidence mixes technical analyses of commercial tools like Pegasus and Circles, leaked intelligence cables describing Mossad activity, and journalistic reporting of strained bilateral intelligence relationships; the pattern shows recurring claims but varies sharply in specificity, sourcing and the balance between commercial spyware deployment and state-level espionage operations [4] [5] [6].
1. What the allegations actually claim — a catalogue that matters
Analysts and journalists present two distinct clusters of claims: one concerns commercial surveillance tools of Israeli origin (NSO Group’s Pegasus and related platforms such as Circles) being used by African governments to monitor politicians, journalists and activists, and the other concerns traditional intelligence operations and alleged Mossad networks (sayanim and covert operatives) embedded or active in African states. Reports identify governments using spyware to target domestic critics and opposition figures, while leaked spy cables and reporting document Mossad activities, volunteer networks and tactics in South Africa specifically [1] [4] [3] [6]. These are separate but overlapping allegations: commercial tools enable mass targeting, whereas intelligence networks suggest directed statecraft.
2. The strongest evidence: technical reports and named client lists
The most concrete public evidence comes from forensic and investigative work linking Israeli-origin surveillance technology to intrusions in African contexts. Citizen Lab-style investigations and journalistic compendia have attributed use of Pegasus-related tools and Circles to governments across the continent; such work names specific countries and documents targeted profiles, creating a tangible forensic trail that differs from the more anecdotal leak-based material [4] [2]. This line of evidence underpins claims about Morocco, Togo, Rwanda, Ghana and others as clients of Israeli spyware ecosystems, and explains why many commentators describe a broader phenomenon of “Israeli spyware diplomacy” in Africa [1] [2].
3. Country-by-country snapshots: named cases and their contours
Multiple sources compile lists of African states alleged to have used Israeli-origin surveillance. Reporting cites at least seven governments—Botswana, Equatorial Guinea, Kenya, Morocco, Nigeria, Zambia and Zimbabwe—as identified in investigations as clients of Israeli-linked tools, with additional reporting naming Ghana, Malawi, and others [2]. South Africa receives distinct attention: apart from spyware allegations, leaked internal cables portray Mossad volunteers and operational activities inside the country, and South African intelligence officials have publicly complained about Israeli agents’ conduct, which frames bilateral intelligence relations as fraught [3] [5] [6]. The strength and public detail of allegations vary widely by country, from forensic linkages to broader journalistic assertions.
4. South Africa’s unique dossier: leaked cables, diplomatic strain and public accusations
South Africa stands out for having a substantial dossier of leaked “spy cables” and public complaints by domestic intelligence officials about Israeli intelligence behavior, along with reporting on Mossad activity and alleged networks of local collaborators. Those leaks describe operational tactics, alleged recruitment of volunteers (sayanim), and interference claims, and they have generated sustained media coverage and official pushback that frames the relationship as adversarial [3] [6] [5]. This differs from the surveillance-tool allegations elsewhere because it centers on alleged human intelligence networks and institutional tension, not purely on commercial spyware deployments.
5. Where the reporting diverges and what is missing from available sources
Sources diverge on attribution, scale and motive. Technical investigations provide concrete intrusion evidence but often stop short of proving direct Israeli state orchestration; commercial vendors, intermediaries and client states complicate attribution [4] [2]. Leaked cables and intelligence complaints underscore human‑network allegations but can be limited by provenance, selective disclosure and lack of corroborating public-forensic detail [3] [6]. Several sources emphasize political agendas—reports framing “spyware diplomacy” may highlight authoritarian misuse, while intelligence leaks can reflect intra‑agency rivalries—so scrutiny of source provenance and possible institutional motives is essential [1] [5].
6. Bottom line: multiple, distinct allegations with varying evidentiary weight
There are indeed multiple allegations across Africa that link Israeli-origin surveillance tools and Israeli intelligence activity to spying on citizens and leaders, with forensic reports naming several client governments and leaked cables documenting Mossad presence in South Africa [1] [4] [2] [3]. The evidence is strongest where technical attribution is published or where multiple independent leaks and journalistic investigations converge; in other cases, claims rely more on single-source leaks or broader assertions. Key open questions remain about direct state responsibility versus commercial vendor misuse, and the degree to which Israeli government policy or private industry practices enabled these operations, underscoring the need for continued forensic and documentary transparency [4] [2].