Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: How much funding has Jack Smith's special counsel received in total?
Executive Summary
Jack Smith’s special counsel funding figures differ across reports because outlets have cited different timeframes and accounting methods. Early DOJ and CBS disclosures in mid-2023 put expenditures in the single-digit millions for the first months of the probe, while later summaries from The Hill and Forbes show totals that grew into double and then higher double digits as investigations continued through 2024; the largest figure in the set of provided analyses is more than $35 million reported by Forbes on August 29, 2024 [1] [2] [3] [4].
1. Why the totals diverge: timelines and accounting explain the gaps
Reports differ primarily because they measure spending across different spans and include different categories of costs. A July 2023 DOJ/CBS snapshot reported roughly $5.4 million spent directly by the special counsel’s office and another $3.8 million for supporting DOJ components in under five months, yielding a headline of “over $9 million” for that early phase [1] [2]. By January 2024 The Hill noted that cumulative federal prosecutorial costs for two Trump cases had surpassed $12 million, with Smith’s office reporting over $7.3 million in a recent six-month stretch [3]. Forbes’ August 29, 2024 piece aggregated later expenditures and reported more than $35 million, breaking that into $19.4 million attributed directly to Smith’s office and $16.3 million in other DOJ support resources [4]. These differences reflect rolling expenditures rather than conflicting arithmetic.
2. What each reported figure actually covers—direct office costs vs. shared DOJ support
The finer detail in the sources shows that some figures represent only Smith’s office payroll, benefits, and immediate operating costs, while others add costs incurred by the FBI, U.S. Marshals, and broader DOJ support. The July 2023 DOJ communication and CBS reporting emphasized personnel compensation and benefits as the largest line items in the initial $5.4 million and the additional $3.8 million for supporting personnel [2] [1]. The Hill’s $12 million snapshot and Forbes’ $35 million aggregation both included broader prosecutorial and investigative resources, though Forbes explicitly itemized the split between Smith’s office and other DOJ components [3] [4]. The presence or absence of these ancillary costs substantially changes the headline total.
3. How reporting cadence and agency disclosures drive public numbers
Federal spending on special counsels is disclosed periodically and often lags the real-time pace of investigations; early DOJ disclosures are point-in-time and then become outdated as cases proceed. The July 2023 disclosures were timely but narrow in scope, capturing an initial burst of costs [2] [1]. Subsequent media updates in January and August 2024 captured additional months of activity and thus larger totals [3] [4]. The pattern shows that media totals are cumulative snapshots, not single reconciled ledgers, meaning the “total” will rise as the investigation continues unless a final closeout report appears.
4. What the later 2025 reports say—or don’t say—about funding
More recent 2025 items in the dataset focused on procedural and congressional issues rather than updating funding totals. Reporting in October 2025 about Smith seeking to testify, and defenses of investigative steps, did not provide new aggregate dollar figures [5] [6] [7]. Those pieces show a shift in coverage from budgetary transparency to legal and oversight disputes, leaving the last explicit comprehensive dollar totals in the provided materials dated to August 2024 [4]. That absence of updated financial disclosure in these later pieces means the most recent authoritative figure in this collection remains Forbes’ August 2024 estimate.
5. How to read these numbers: caveats, likely undercounts, and political framing
All sources carry potential framing biases: early DOJ briefings emphasize operational necessities and staffing, while media outlets may highlight totals to signal scale or controversy. The smaller early numbers are not contradictions so much as incomplete slices; the larger figures reflect cumulative activity and include interagency costs [2] [1] [3] [4]. Users should also note that ongoing legal work, appeals, and related security or logistics can continue adding costs after published snapshots. Because the dataset stops at August 2024 for comprehensive totals and later pieces omit dollar updates, any final cumulative total would require a later DOJ closeout or a subsequent detailed audit.
6. Bottom line: the best-supported current total from these sources and what’s missing
Within the provided analyses, the best-supported, most recent aggregate figure is “more than $35 million” as of August 29, 2024, attributed as $19.4 million by Smith’s office and $16.3 million by other DOJ resources [4]. Earlier authoritative snapshots show the progression from roughly $9 million in mid-2023 to over $12 million by January 2024, reflecting ongoing spending [1] [2] [3]. To move beyond these figures and produce a definitive up-to-date total would require a later DOJ accounting or a contemporaneous investigative reconciliation absent from the current source set.