James Tallarico US Senate Democratic primary candidate voting record and stated values
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
James Talarico is a Democratic Texas state representative who announced a 2025 bid for the U.S. Senate and is positioning himself as a faith-forward, anti–big‑donor progressive with outreach to moderate and disaffected Republican voters [1] [2]. Reporting and scorecards cited in candidate profiles document a legislative record on public‑education and social issues with mixed ratings from conservative and progressive groups; Vote Smart and legislative vote trackers list his votes but are summarized rather than exhaustively reproduced in current reporting [3] [4] [5].
1. A candidate framed by faith and anti‑corruption rhetoric
Talarico’s campaign materials and interviews emphasize his religious background (Presbyterian seminary training) and a theme of fighting “billionaire mega‑donors and puppet politicians,” language he uses to define his values and Senate pitch [2] [1]. News outlets note he frames his faith publicly, including sermons and speeches that ask how Jesus would approach contemporary politics [6] [2].
2. What his voting record shows — education and procedural votes
Local education groups and legislative trackers have highlighted Talarico’s votes on bills affecting schools: for example, ATPE’s candidate/record pages catalog his votes on amendments related to vouchers and UIL participation, noting he supported an amendment to prohibit state funds for private school vouchers and has other votes recorded in House journals [4]. BillTrack50 and Vote Smart are cited as primary repositories for his sponsored bills and key votes, though current summaries in the press point readers to those resources rather than enumerating every roll call [5] [3].
3. Competing ratings and ideological squeeze
Conservative and fiscal groups like Young Conservatives of Texas and Texans for Fiscal Responsibility publish ratings on his record; those outlets exist to measure votes on government size and related issues, signaling that Talarico’s scores vary widely across ideological scorecards [7] [8]. Ballotpedia and other aggregators caution that scorecards use different methodologies and should be weighed individually, which frames why opponents and supporters cite different metrics to advance opposing narratives [9].
4. Tensions within the Democratic primary over donors and messaging
Talarico’s anti‑mega‑donor theme has been challenged by rival Democrats who point to his acceptance of certain large donations, an intra‑party critique reported at the Texas Tribune festival and elsewhere [10]. Campaign and press accounts show competing narratives: Talarico’s campaign stresses grassroots energy and record fundraising, while rivals press inconsistencies between rhetoric and donor lists [10] [2].
5. Transgender rights and social‑issue flashpoints
Profiles and feature reporting say Talarico has taken public stands on transgender rights — his team asserts a clear record and notes a May 2025 House floor appearance supporting transgender protections — but critics and some reporting frame his approach as cautious or evasive in tone, reflecting broader intra‑party debates about messaging and electoral strategy [11] [12]. Specific roll‑call citations on those measures are referred to in source archives like Vote Smart and legislative journals rather than fully quoted in news summaries [3] [4].
6. Electability argument: courting moderates vs. energizing the base
Campaign commentary and polling context show Talarico arguing he can win crossover voters and disaffected Republicans, while polling and name‑recognition gaps complicate that claim: polls released in December 2025 show Jasmine Crockett leading Talarico among likely Democratic primary voters 51% to 43%, with Crockett far higher on name ID [13] [14]. Analysts quoted in reporting say Talarico’s path depends on expanding recognition and translating social‑media followings into votes [12] [1].
7. Where to look next — how to verify his record yourself
For a granular, vote‑by‑vote accounting, the consistent sources cited in coverage are Vote Smart’s key‑votes collection, the Texas House journal entries summarized by ATPE/TeachTheVote, BillTrack50 for sponsored legislation, and Ballotpedia for contextual scorecards; each has limitations and differing methodologies that readers should cross‑check [3] [4] [5] [9]. Available sources do not mention a single consolidated, campaign‑authorized roll‑call ledger synthesizing every contested vote.
Limitations and competing viewpoints: reporting cites Talarico’s own framing of faith and anti‑donor values [2] and also shows opponents questioning donor consistency [10]. Scorecards and trackers exist but use divergent criteria, so conclusions about whether his record is “progressive” or “moderate” depend on which metrics a reader trusts [9] [7].